From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9564EC433E6 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 09:55:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C9764F61 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 09:55:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233562AbhBCJzw (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 04:55:52 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52490 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232665AbhBCJzu (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 04:55:50 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x52a.google.com (mail-pg1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EEF9C061573; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 01:55:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id o7so16990157pgl.1; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 01:55:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+bo/zgaVjQeP7++vzeOAe4Vhz68x/IDfWUtflXKD340=; b=O6lYx4v2jphlo088w60X2hiEUW5E/zcyh633GTmFsfaT5i3JtT5bZGKEO+JmqgkcoR x16/HDNdVq6+5Y/pMS+FThkXRWulfkixEV51at1SueD+vP2OC4Oxo+jaGxyUvtSThho2 0HkK4G3dYjHuD7wNvsRY7Fw9BNfgQvVfG/CsEhksnv0V4TmdpVZ/suKPOESKmapOxpFJ zdhOD7IKpo2pLYKFX5sZtx5HxpmrPTXNqQjtPp63C8/GZlC/AWx9b+91cHf7ZcOiSlk+ pmqhd1YxamddduYVXrOogtItXuwa44siN0e2quXllFavSWH6bzIV/EaGKCvW3JkHg59k OgWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+bo/zgaVjQeP7++vzeOAe4Vhz68x/IDfWUtflXKD340=; b=dyS5quCFnNdlvvpzvAPe8tJweIsOiosjz/1fcNjtq1dBdtbRgeMrvL/kakfUJtapyt Mj4bLJqI6m2wvb/UewLjRJJxK97lLjVNokRRNSXjtgS1QtDCNFNtTewX706fsbXltMT4 sEYua94IdFjImI3jk0iPYDFZhUi+oPTUIrxVOWGjHE6TQ80QgsgWws+q3GN5KjmO4pXr K1mhhvUjccY5Vrksc/a/hw0SvJLznx7CfnZsZSiqx/o9od25joMVIYuExUSjkV17Mtq/ 3Cov6D530VEeBC50TNQfZCz4B23BM17PPtPzxH5iT0BtBRchz15lmRgSSIpnM8I9V+2E L7aw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533UfwBwD7fx4Q1gK3a5WEalSgnPC66fX96/qD6x/nYfC1we8ihS tMxbIMz4OW3TLYcZYlK33tS0iZpK2JSeDtqfBhc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxELw6TjyxQIIVK+eBpxR00dR7Zy9TYfwhTJoq2bK39kzfeWtfoP5QIJmXXcm7/0q3ZJfdqsSfEpedo/Np5TNw= X-Received: by 2002:a63:e50:: with SMTP id 16mr2766950pgo.74.1612346109732; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 01:55:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <886bbdc0-3391-2140-a2d4-1688b262966f@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <886bbdc0-3391-2140-a2d4-1688b262966f@redhat.com> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 11:54:53 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ib-drm-gpio-pdx86-rtc-wdt-v5.12-1 To: Hans de Goede Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Platform Driver , Mark Gross , Patrik Jakobsson , dri-devel , Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , "open list:REAL TIME CLOCK (RTC) SUBSYSTEM" , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Wim Van Sebroeck , Guenter Roeck , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 4:23 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > On 1/26/21 1:38 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > This is first part of Intel MID outdated platforms removal. It's collected into > > immutable branch with a given tag, please pull to yours subsystems. > > > > (All changes are tagged by the respective maintainers) > Erm, I already have this 2 in platform-drivers-x86/for-next since you said that > these 2 could be merged independently. > > Anyways I just did a test-merge and there is no conflict, so everything is ok. > > From my pov this looks good and I plan to merge this into platform-drivers-x86/for-next > before the merge-window. > > I'm going to hold off on doing that for a bit for now in case one of the other > subsys maintainers has any objections. Any news on this? Have you pulled it somewhere (I don't see it in Linux next)? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko