From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09BECC433E3 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 06:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7248206E3 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 06:49:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="R6h+yfGp" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728173AbgGUGtY (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2020 02:49:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39580 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726039AbgGUGtY (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2020 02:49:24 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x441.google.com (mail-pf1-x441.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::441]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D631FC061794; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 23:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x441.google.com with SMTP id t11so10254091pfq.11; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 23:49:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ejqBHtg283SBgNkVrzPkBd/pxK3TJnovPA7dWwKKA/w=; b=R6h+yfGpm7mi98g869/dIddeP9Oki0hk5N4DKxjca0FQSCtVPgOu8sYv36ETHJsbPq czkIpBsaS5V0+eCZm//w7k96b9HbOMKNqZSba9Ret24RJgZV6C4/+ViwttqNI15BKTW4 uy/5GuKTVD3Q6CQS8j/xJBHy3/i8/QX5czIX2FsAqDXdNzOL+BSj2fc1UHkrVyMwged4 NawSqOz6kKdAfxjSy0U5tU1Qh8qJ0vo2smGXZ8zojrjSRJi55rO0Cs2B2lSJTK4jhPO6 7m/ywnVXxQA8pLA/20vDJGAdUf13TcRyYV+ItMIeXdXR9C+umKR5Edi88Yn1PkTbnpJ5 PLwQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ejqBHtg283SBgNkVrzPkBd/pxK3TJnovPA7dWwKKA/w=; b=eWBdg9WcS0aAA1T0jvyZsY67OM5E9eD+HEDtUz3c0CaUbDfHcAeg136oYZbfbkh6aR 80BtyjHGv0oQ9eZl/kjiJoIGoktmQykmHnTJiJhWK2dkgX/wvWV22gq2tpPj6xAF67jH Ed/JDb3Cz03wCGWKMaHHDryOqgYsntn61e4cChvINITutIuuHTJhcsMte/17myNpH3Gj nyuFd3Zp05EGdCJNuwLONRsI9h9YPtzSdkke5kjsC4Ch3sG8GTWeHYjU4T6e/RA3QFrF E+MCDs5FfvKHmHGAoiDwzIC1emo7W3BLxyE38MQyFPl1W0uXGFWpXGDa2Skp5xUgSvMv mVDg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531mMlNH382ewNVk3rIH9/9qYBgelrJkkMIVw5euae70WO+K6L7b D1eBQOz0Ik24okOBU+dNzVVn9BzVo0sUPXPy4TEewrty X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxLldfRRc8hAxAiVLEmEgeVstSOXS/bAmu56S71bU3biPhc9gdo6NuUU4ODEXg8x/ej7Oj0sBVx8AbN5PFbUzY= X-Received: by 2002:a62:7657:: with SMTP id r84mr22157295pfc.130.1595314163324; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 23:49:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200720191740.1974132-1-drew@beagleboard.org> In-Reply-To: <20200720191740.1974132-1-drew@beagleboard.org> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 09:49:07 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: core: print gpio in pins debugfs file To: Drew Fustini Cc: Tony Lindgren , Linus Walleij , Linux OMAP Mailing List , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jason Kridner , Robert Nelson Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 10:18 PM Drew Fustini wrote: > > If there is a gpio range mapping for the pin, then print out the gpio > number for the pin in the debugfs 'pins' file. > > Here is an example output on the BeagleBone Black from: > /sys/kernel/debug/pinctrl/44e10800.pinmux-pinctrl-single/pins > > pin 100 (PIN100) gpiochip:gpio-96-127 line-name:P1.36 [PWM0A] 44e10990 00000001 pinctrl-single > pin 101 (PIN101) gpiochip:gpio-96-127 line-name:P1.33 [PRU0.1] 44e10994 00000027 pinctrl-single > pin 102 (PIN102) gpiochip:gpio-96-127 line-name:P2.32 [PRU0.2] 44e10998 00000027 pinctrl-single It becomes unnecessarily long. I would drop these 'gpiochip:' and 'line-name:' prefixes and NA case you rather should have the same amount of arguments, so here would be something like NA NA or alike. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko