linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	soc@kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
	"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Teichmann <lists@peter-teichmann.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] [RFC] ARM: remove Intel iop33x and iop13xx support
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:48:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3Jtc-hgP+st=oDUF2hWkLK7CCM461YSA2ks3dqcv-W7g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdao8LF8g5qi_h+9BT9cHwmB4OadabkdGfP0sEFeLbmiLw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 10:36 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:45 AM Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> wrote:
>
> > As Arnd points out, Debian used to have support for various iop32x
> > devices.  While Debian hasn't supported iop32x in a number of years,
> > these devices are still usable and in use (RMK being a prime example).
>
> I suppose it could be a good idea to add support for iop32x to
> OpenWrt and/or OpenEmbedded, both of which support some
> pretty constrained systems. I am personally using these
> distributions to support elder ARM hardware these days.

OpenWRT also had support in the past and dropped it around the
same time as Debian. The way I understand it, a couple of platforms
including iop32x were moved out of the main openwrt source tree
into https://github.com/openwrt/targets/ because there was little
interest in keeping them running.

The idea was that any remaining users could add that feed to get
minimal support, but I'm not sure if would still work. In particular,
iop33x appears to be based on linux-3.3 plus three patches that
are no longer needed in mainline. Building a mainline kernel without
those patches may or may not work.

        Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-14 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20190809162956.488941-1-arnd@arndb.de>
2019-08-09 16:33 ` [PATCH 1/7] [RFC] ARM: remove Intel iop33x and iop13xx support Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-09 16:33   ` [PATCH 2/7] dma: iop-adma: include prefetch.h Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-13  4:33     ` Vinod Koul
2019-08-14 15:29       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-09 16:33   ` [PATCH 3/7] dma: iop-adma: use correct printk format strings Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-13  4:33     ` Vinod Koul
2019-08-09 16:33   ` [PATCH 4/7] dma: iop-adma: allow building without platform headers Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-09 16:33   ` [PATCH 5/7] ARM: xscale: fix multi-cpu compilation Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-23  7:44     ` Linus Walleij
2019-08-09 16:33   ` [PATCH 6/7] ARM: iop32x: make mach/uncompress.h independent of mach/hardware.h Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-09 16:33   ` [PATCH 7/7] ARM: iop32x: merge everything into mach-iop32x/ Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-09 16:57   ` [PATCH 1/7] [RFC] ARM: remove Intel iop33x and iop13xx support Wolfram Sang
2019-08-09 18:34   ` Dan Williams
2019-08-09 18:36     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-08-09 19:43       ` Dan Williams
2019-08-12  9:44     ` Martin Michlmayr
2019-08-14  8:36       ` Linus Walleij
2019-08-14 10:48         ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2019-08-16 15:42         ` Aaro Koskinen
2019-08-16 15:58           ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-08-16 16:15             ` Aaro Koskinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAK8P3a3Jtc-hgP+st=oDUF2hWkLK7CCM461YSA2ks3dqcv-W7g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=lists@peter-teichmann.de \
    --cc=soc@kernel.org \
    --cc=tbm@cyrius.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).