From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Drew Fustini <drew@pdp7.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] gpio: expose pull-up/pull-down line flags to userspace
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 14:46:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MfY19A6btCZFHfz+Bp5SoppVos3c6gq589osfVWdShpeA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=McH=ui1c9yTMtuMwVUT2-yBHhV=r0VGsKY0KbYMLHJhPA@mail.gmail.com>
pt., 4 paź 2019 o 09:22 Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> napisał(a):
>
> czw., 3 paź 2019 o 14:47 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> napisał(a):
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:38 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> >
> > > I remember discussing it with Linus some time ago. This may not be as
> > > straightforward as simply adding new flags. Since PULL-UP/DOWN
> > > resistors can - among other parameters - also have configurable
> > > resistance, we'll probably need some kind of a structure for this
> > > ioctl() to pass any additional information to the kernel. Since we
> > > can't change ABI this may require adding a whole new ioctl() for
> > > extended configuration. This in turn has to be as future-proof as
> > > possible - if someone asks for user-space-configurable drive-strength,
> > > the new ioctl() should be ready for it.
> > >
> > > I should have some bandwidth in the coming days, so I'll try to give it a try.
> >
> > What we did for the in-kernel API and the Device Tree ABI
> > was to simply say that if you need such elaborate control over
> > the line, it needs to be done with a proper pin control driver.
> >
> > So for lines that just have the GPIO_PULL_UP or
> > GPIO_PULL_DOWN set as a (one-bit) flag, what you will
> > get is "typical" pull down/up (whatever the hardware default
> > is, or what the driver thinks is default, which should be safe
> > so the highest possible pull resistance I suppose).
> >
> > So one option is to just go with these flags and explicitly
> > say that it will give a "system default (high resistance)
> > pull up/down".
> >
> > That said, the pin controller back-end is fully capable of
> > accepting more elaborate configuration, so if we prefer then
> > we can make the more complex userspace ABI that can
> > set it to a desired-or-default resistance.
> >
> > I lean toward simplicity here. I haven't seen that these
> > userspace consumers need very elaborate control of this
> > resistance, they are for one-off hacks and as such should
> > be fine with just default pull up/down I think?
> >
> > I think that specifying "this line will use pull up/down"
> > at request time and having the driver set a safe default
> > pull-up/down as response, (and pretty much what this
> > patch does) and then add another explicit
> > ioctl to refine it the day we need it is a viable way forward.
> >
> > in the future something like:
> > #define GPIOHANDLE_SET_LINE_CONFIG_IOCTL _IOWR(0xB4, 0x0a, struct
> > gpiohandle_config)
> >
> > And then, when we need it, try to come up with some
> > really flexible ABI for the config, based on
> > include/linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h
> >
>
> Thanks for your input Linus. I'm good with that. The config ioctl (or
> something similar) you're mentioning may appear sooner actually -
> users of libgpiod have been requesting a way of changing the direction
> of a line without releasing it - something that's possible in the
> kernel, but not from user-space at the moment. I'll submit something
> that allows to change the configuration of a requested line soon.
>
> Bart
Cc'ing Kent, as he might be interested in this.
I'll be travelling tomorrow and will have a couple hours on the plane,
so I'll try to cook up an additional ioctl for configuration changes
of requested lines with additional padding for future extension.
Bart
>
> > But no upfront code for that right now as it is not needed.
> > A practical usecase must come first.
> >
> > Yours,
> > Linus Walleij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-04 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-21 10:25 [RFC] gpio: expose pull-up/pull-down line flags to userspace Drew Fustini
2019-09-23 8:38 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-10-02 11:10 ` Drew Fustini
2019-10-03 12:47 ` Linus Walleij
2019-10-04 7:22 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-10-04 12:46 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2019-10-05 17:02 ` Linus Walleij
2019-10-06 3:12 ` Kent Gibson
2019-10-06 21:06 ` Linus Walleij
2019-10-07 4:37 ` Kent Gibson
2019-10-08 6:15 ` Kent Gibson
2019-10-08 20:56 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-10-08 23:21 ` Kent Gibson
2019-10-08 23:30 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-10-08 23:56 ` Kent Gibson
2019-10-09 0:03 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-10-09 0:22 ` Kent Gibson
2019-10-09 6:55 ` Kent Gibson
2019-10-09 12:57 ` Drew Fustini
2019-10-09 13:23 ` Kent Gibson
2019-10-09 13:30 ` Drew Fustini
2019-10-09 14:11 ` Kent Gibson
2019-10-09 15:50 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-10-09 16:19 ` Kent Gibson
2019-10-09 23:59 ` Kent Gibson
2019-10-10 7:47 ` Drew Fustini
2019-10-10 10:14 ` Kent Gibson
2019-10-10 11:17 ` Kent Gibson
2019-10-11 13:04 ` Drew Fustini
2019-10-11 13:06 ` Drew Fustini
2019-10-11 13:49 ` Kent Gibson
2019-10-09 11:32 ` Drew Fustini
2019-10-09 13:57 ` Drew Fustini
2019-10-09 14:01 ` Kent Gibson
2019-10-09 11:46 ` Drew Fustini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMRc=MfY19A6btCZFHfz+Bp5SoppVos3c6gq589osfVWdShpeA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=drew@pdp7.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).