From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84AE5C38A2D for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 13:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232897AbiJYNfJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2022 09:35:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58514 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232875AbiJYNfI (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2022 09:35:08 -0400 Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7A72108DD3 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 06:35:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1666704907; x=1698240907; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=jYNNblmmEdUtvpRaTp6byuwPnm4td70UypQkTQ3DsCE=; b=DgppIAowL9JUE+68gH9yfxZtkx7a7YBNiK9LTOpxqM/njSdNPVJczKvg TeU9zBisKl38vpE2LEJq3TAC+IEMeN0laYO1lHJACUiwKE9xFT/h1XG8y v/8mZNYt8fgZUzIIbAnr7SgEKhKQtKyuFfWs3WVzAjqal1JDpC7xiaE5o B4YKuQYE81QPTRWFhxbRztR2T/OgnQsy7F8orEZbZ0fkcAS1TsZ7fJ1jU 0IRHo5aEdGPCGBrCfqkjU/7KHXzP/0xjr2kM++avvY+sDYJEQEapmqp/w oHpaQve4JmkfM8jIIoX9KzXSlVboLFfTV2s+rBToZMoIlNADJn0LW+hDH Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10510"; a="290975400" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,212,1661842800"; d="scan'208";a="290975400" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Oct 2022 06:34:57 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10510"; a="736824881" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,212,1661842800"; d="scan'208";a="736824881" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Oct 2022 06:34:55 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1onK50-0021RN-1c; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 16:34:54 +0300 Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 16:34:54 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Linus Walleij Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , Linux pin control , Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] intel-pinctrl for 6.1-1 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 06:06:52PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 09:16:28AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 10:04 PM Andy Shevchenko > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 10:02:35AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: ... > > > > Bart are you fine with pulling this as-is? (I am.) > > > > > > Hold on a bit, I have to rebuild a whole kernel to test if I missed something > > > (it's already clear I missed lantiq patch, now in my branch, but obviously not > > > in that tag, since I called it immutable). > > > > OK I hold my horses waiting for your confirmation, I expect to > > pull the immutable branch once it is confirmed stable. > > I hope I found all places under drivers/pinctrl to fix, but let's wait > a couple of days so Linux Next and CIs may have a chance to exercise it > a bit. New PR has been sent. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko