From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622BDC433E6 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 15:06:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3538D64E07 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 15:06:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236799AbhCAPFl (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2021 10:05:41 -0500 Received: from mail-bn8nam11on2072.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.236.72]:3651 "EHLO NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236802AbhCAPFY (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2021 10:05:24 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=gsRBCKx0XOjSM6O44ZZGgGGx5lbmwTTIIuf/0Oe04X2Vi2Iq3sqcqQAcYI9wIDd1ACZlLW+ZunlHs3MXgz1iIPKLc0Ab3MHHQTkqh/2kmYl8bwCiLjIGTLul3c6kmZ5447oP0CQJ8tMKC4f1+CeQj1xgSb1nSZ/Ux+7JgdvXzwWePIOo4NWOV6OvN7G4xJHXkJ4lc66WlVV7H0HBowLvNzTu2tNWy/bfWlSoOOBlqtV6vngfDkr+ztLkK5t0rWXKLZCLF6I0pne762Nm4d/yFvp0Ctc+We1lNVdyhQVB7j+19ZSJyc3zvD8m3mnUPZkq5+h4Bjw6UfHyLiaIv96mZg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=uxPupzbl1G3E+TUxv32ZgRflszU8OAGWqKYKaUrJcXM=; b=HAAEC+bDJN60wL5strMpggrLOAAVjvRjB/62bw0fOLnefmSR+sIVmJO790GvOWClBzDSj8kXBrCWlNNPnwoIgaf6+JFbe78HcS+Q9nilAwaFquVbEXBuB73wZyaBK0xmSFqu2U+EkCqsOWpDi3r70P1rVXK27SS9dLaJJ7zCMxKoUZu77UBM7kNXxfKBfhsE2QA53k0JHtCGzz5Wh3mcWm+ELHpTrX5GLq9oQ+azfHqgtCTk6HwUJXLlXDKO70oIfJg8FsqcQsFF/4ltSffGWFSP48epeqSqUMFOJKlWI+E0O2a6NYb2KEUQsQu3L5MNz/RXaF89X9qtOHx7AdhtMw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 149.199.62.198) smtp.rcpttodomain=vger.kernel.org smtp.mailfrom=xilinx.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=xilinx.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xilinx.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-xilinx-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=uxPupzbl1G3E+TUxv32ZgRflszU8OAGWqKYKaUrJcXM=; b=kqwpVneN29j5mTR4yj3VXJWIFvOK8OqvcM84Spp94Eoif0tzRt0YwAAj0vW62yY1cK0eloR8znONEybQ5H6/gvu9z9j4rOAlyXXHY2tGYE5T6hY1FRdBv1c/mogcpmfHuc4Hfy+rL2DeCo5HT6+4JQ373dfbCXarCchyxCV1fXE= Received: from SA9PR13CA0130.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:806:27::15) by MWHPR02MB3197.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:301:61::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3890.28; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 15:04:29 +0000 Received: from SN1NAM02FT026.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:806:27:cafe::59) by SA9PR13CA0130.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:806:27::15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3912.9 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 15:04:29 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 149.199.62.198) smtp.mailfrom=xilinx.com; vger.kernel.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=xilinx.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of xilinx.com designates 149.199.62.198 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=149.199.62.198; helo=xsj-pvapexch01.xlnx.xilinx.com; Received: from xsj-pvapexch01.xlnx.xilinx.com (149.199.62.198) by SN1NAM02FT026.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.72.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.20.3890.19 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 15:04:29 +0000 Received: from xsj-pvapexch01.xlnx.xilinx.com (172.19.86.40) by xsj-pvapexch01.xlnx.xilinx.com (172.19.86.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 07:04:28 -0800 Received: from smtp.xilinx.com (172.19.127.96) by xsj-pvapexch01.xlnx.xilinx.com (172.19.86.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.1913.5 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 07:04:28 -0800 Envelope-to: lakshmi.sai.krishna.potthuri@xilinx.com, michal.simek@xilinx.com, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org Received: from [172.30.17.109] (port=44550) by smtp.xilinx.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90) (envelope-from ) id 1lGk60-000773-CU; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 07:04:28 -0800 Subject: Re: DT overlay applied via pinctrl description To: Linus Walleij , Michal Simek CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Sai Krishna Potthuri References: <63d610ba-5f63-2be1-6215-f44bd88d94d2@xilinx.com> <45cea3bb-6e5d-4005-ef2a-67b08772e0d7@xilinx.com> From: Michal Simek Message-ID: Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 16:04:26 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-Office365-Filtering-HT: Tenant X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: cd87de47-5c17-475c-0b61-08d8dcc35013 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: MWHPR02MB3197: X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:4303; X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:149.199.62.198;CTRY:US;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:xsj-pvapexch01.xlnx.xilinx.com;PTR:unknown-62-198.xilinx.com;CAT:NONE;SFS:(4636009)(39850400004)(376002)(396003)(136003)(346002)(36840700001)(46966006)(5660300002)(54906003)(26005)(7636003)(36906005)(356005)(107886003)(426003)(2616005)(316002)(31696002)(4326008)(336012)(70586007)(110136005)(186003)(70206006)(36860700001)(4744005)(8936002)(82310400003)(44832011)(31686004)(478600001)(53546011)(47076005)(36756003)(82740400003)(8676002)(9786002)(2906002)(50156003)(43740500002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: xilinx.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Mar 2021 15:04:29.2284 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: cd87de47-5c17-475c-0b61-08d8dcc35013 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c;Ip=[149.199.62.198];Helo=[xsj-pvapexch01.xlnx.xilinx.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: SN1NAM02FT026.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR02MB3197 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On 3/1/21 3:13 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 10:31 AM Michal Simek wrote: >> On 3/1/21 10:19 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> Does this mean that you prefer to fix how dt overlay applying instead of >> fixing code to apply mux configs first before conf one? >> >> Something like this? (just c&p patch below) > > I think your patch looks correct! Can you make a proper patch, > make sure it solves your problem and submit to the mailing > list for review? I will check it on our platform and will send proper patch for it. Thanks, Michal