linux-hardening.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Len Baker" <len.baker@gmx.com>,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
	"Haiyang Zhang" <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	"Stephen Hemminger" <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
	"Wei Liu" <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
	"Dexuan Cui" <decui@microsoft.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Colin Ian King" <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mana: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 19:11:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210918152604.GB15999@titan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D81D1EE2-92A0-42D5-9238-9B05E4BDE230@chromium.org>

Hi Kees,

On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 06:51:51AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>
>
> On September 18, 2021 6:20:10 AM PDT, Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 12:28:18PM +0200, Len Baker wrote:
> >> As noted in the "Deprecated Interfaces, Language Features, Attributes,
> >> and Conventions" documentation [1], size calculations (especially
> >> multiplication) should not be performed in memory allocator (or similar)
> >> function arguments due to the risk of them overflowing. This could lead
> >> to values wrapping around and a smaller allocation being made than the
> >> caller was expecting. Using those allocations could lead to linear
> >> overflows of heap memory and other misbehaviors.
> >>
> >> So, use the struct_size() helper to do the arithmetic instead of the
> >> argument "size + count * size" in the kzalloc() function.
> >>
> >> [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.14/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/hw_channel.c | 4 +---
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/hw_channel.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/hw_channel.c
> >> index 1a923fd99990..0efdc6c3c32a 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/hw_channel.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/hw_channel.c
> >> @@ -398,9 +398,7 @@ static int mana_hwc_alloc_dma_buf(struct hw_channel_context *hwc, u16 q_depth,
> >>  	int err;
> >>  	u16 i;
> >>
> >> -	dma_buf = kzalloc(sizeof(*dma_buf) +
> >> -			  q_depth * sizeof(struct hwc_work_request),
> >> -			  GFP_KERNEL);
> >> +	dma_buf = kzalloc(struct_size(dma_buf, reqs, q_depth), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>  	if (!dma_buf)
> >>  		return -ENOMEM;
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.25.1
> >>
> >
> >I have received a email from the linux-media subsystem telling that this
> >patch is not applicable. The email is the following:
> >
> >Hello,
> >
> >The following patch (submitted by you) has been updated in Patchwork:
> >
> > * linux-media: net: mana: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic
> >     - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/20210911102818.3804-1-len.baker@gmx.com/
> >     - for: Linux Media kernel patches
> >    was: New
> >    now: Not Applicable
> >
> >This email is a notification only - you do not need to respond.
> >
> >The question is: Why it is not applicable?. I have no received any bad comment
> >and a "Reviewed-by:" tag from Haiyang Zhang. So, what is the reason for the
> >"Not Applicable" state?.
>
> That is the "Media" subsystem patch tracker. The patch appears to be for networking, so the Media tracker has marked it as "not applicable [to the media subsystem]".
>
> The CC list for this patch seems rather wide (media, dri). I would have expected only netdev. Were you using scripts/get_maintainer.pl for getting addresses?

Yes, my workflow is scripts/checkpatch.pl and then scripts/get_maintainer.pl
before sending any patch :)

Regards,
Len
>
> -Kees

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-18 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-11 10:28 Len Baker
2021-09-11 13:36 ` Haiyang Zhang
2021-09-18 13:20 ` Len Baker
2021-09-18 13:51   ` Kees Cook
2021-09-18 17:11     ` Len Baker [this message]
2021-09-18 17:06   ` Dexuan Cui
2021-09-19  8:27     ` Len Baker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210918152604.GB15999@titan \
    --to=len.baker@gmx.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] net: mana: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).