linux-hardening.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] writeback: prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 11:46:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210919094630.30668-1-len.baker@gmx.com> (raw)

As noted in the "Deprecated Interfaces, Language Features, Attributes,
and Conventions" documentation [1], size calculations (especially
multiplication) should not be performed in memory allocator (or similar)
function arguments due to the risk of them overflowing. This could lead
to values wrapping around and a smaller allocation being made than the
caller was expecting. Using those allocations could lead to linear
overflows of heap memory and other misbehaviors.

In this case this is not actually dynamic size: all the operands
involved in the calculation are constant values. However it is best to
refactor this anyway, just to keep the open-coded math idiom out of
code.

So, use the struct_size() helper to do the arithmetic instead of the
argument "size + count * size" in the kzalloc() function.

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments

Signed-off-by: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com>
---
 fs/fs-writeback.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 81ec192ce067..f7abff31e026 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -624,8 +624,8 @@ bool cleanup_offline_cgwb(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
 	int nr;
 	bool restart = false;

-	isw = kzalloc(sizeof(*isw) + WB_MAX_INODES_PER_ISW *
-		      sizeof(struct inode *), GFP_KERNEL);
+	isw = kzalloc(struct_size(isw, inodes, WB_MAX_INODES_PER_ISW),
+		      GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!isw)
 		return restart;

--
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-09-19  9:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-19  9:46 Len Baker [this message]
2021-09-21  0:17 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210919094630.30668-1-len.baker@gmx.com \
    --to=len.baker@gmx.com \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] writeback: prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).