linux-hardening.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vito Caputo <vcaputo@pengaru.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Josh Poimboeuf" <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Stefan Metzmacher" <metze@samba.org>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Lai Jiangshan" <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Christian Brauner" <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Kenta.Tada@sony.com" <Kenta.Tada@sony.com>,
	"Daniel Bristot de Oliveira" <bristot@redhat.com>,
	"Michael Weiß" <michael.weiss@aisec.fraunhofer.de>,
	"Anand K Mistry" <amistry@google.com>,
	"Alexey Gladkov" <legion@kernel.org>,
	"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>, "Helge Deller" <deller@gmx.de>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Andrea Righi" <andrea.righi@canonical.com>,
	"Ohhoon Kwon" <ohoono.kwon@samsung.com>,
	"Kalesh Singh" <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
	"YiFei Zhu" <yifeifz2@illinois.edu>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: Disable /proc/$pid/wchan
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 18:34:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210924013408.mqw42x4lhqeq5ios@shells.gnugeneration.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202109231814.FD09DBAD3@keescook>

On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 06:16:16PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 05:22:30PM -0700, Vito Caputo wrote:
> > Instead of unwinding stacks maybe the kernel should be sticking an
> > entrypoint address in the current task struct for get_wchan() to
> > access, whenever userspace enters the kernel?
> 
> wchan is supposed to show where the kernel is at the instant the
> get_wchan() happens. (i.e. recording it at syscall entry would just
> always show syscall entry.)
> 

And you have the syscall # onhand when performing the syscall entry,
no?

The point is, if the alternative is to always get 0 from
/proc/PID/wchan when a process is sitting in ioctl(), I'd be perfectly
happy to get back sys_ioctl.  I'm under the impression there's quite a
bit of vendor-specific flexibility here in terms of how precise WCHAN
is.

If it's possible to preserve the old WCHAN precision I'm all for it.
But if we've become so paranoid about leaking anything about the
kernel to userspace that this is untenable, even if it just spits out
the syscall being performed that has value.

Regards,
Vito Caputo

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-24  1:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-23 23:31 [PATCH] proc: Disable /proc/$pid/wchan Kees Cook
2021-09-23 23:38 ` Kees Cook
2021-09-24 13:31   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 23:49 ` Vito Caputo
2021-09-24  0:08   ` Jann Horn
2021-09-24  0:22     ` Vito Caputo
2021-09-24  1:16       ` Kees Cook
2021-09-24  1:34         ` Vito Caputo [this message]
2021-09-24  1:42           ` Kees Cook
2021-09-24 13:54         ` Mark Rutland
2021-09-24 14:26           ` Kees Cook
2021-09-27  9:03             ` Mark Rutland
2021-09-27 18:07               ` Kees Cook
2021-09-27 20:50                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-09-29 18:54                   ` Kees Cook
2021-09-29 19:00                     ` Mark Brown
2021-09-29 19:26                       ` Kees Cook
2021-09-29 19:40                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-29 21:10                       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-09-27  9:16           ` David Laight
2021-09-29  8:48           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-24  2:13 ` Andrew Morton
2021-09-24  6:04   ` Kees Cook
2021-09-24 13:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-30 18:05 ` Stephen Brennan
2021-09-30 18:12   ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210924013408.mqw42x4lhqeq5ios@shells.gnugeneration.com \
    --to=vcaputo@pengaru.com \
    --cc=Kenta.Tada@sony.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=amistry@google.com \
    --cc=andrea.righi@canonical.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=laijs@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=legion@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=metze@samba.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=michael.weiss@aisec.fraunhofer.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ohoono.kwon@samsung.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yifeifz2@illinois.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).