linux-hardening.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Cc: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com>, Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aio: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 18:23:14 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211020232314.GA1314273@embeddedor> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6cd35222-cc17-b3f5-dad4-ed540e0df79b@embeddedor.com>

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 07:11:17PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/19/21 04:45, Len Baker wrote:
> > As noted in the "Deprecated Interfaces, Language Features, Attributes,
> > and Conventions" documentation [1], size calculations (especially
> > multiplication) should not be performed in memory allocator (or similar)
> > function arguments due to the risk of them overflowing. This could lead
> > to values wrapping around and a smaller allocation being made than the
> > caller was expecting. Using those allocations could lead to linear
> > overflows of heap memory and other misbehaviors.
> > 
> > So, use the struct_size() helper to do the arithmetic instead of the
> > argument "size + size * count" in the kzalloc() function.
> > 
> > [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>

I'm taking this in my -next tree.

Thanks, Len.
--
Gustavo

      reply	other threads:[~2021-10-20 23:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-19  9:45 [PATCH] aio: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic Len Baker
2021-09-21  0:11 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2021-10-20 23:23   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211020232314.GA1314273@embeddedor \
    --to=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=len.baker@gmx.com \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).