From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ariadne Conill <ariadne@dereferenced.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exec: Force single empty string when argv is empty
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 12:31:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202202021229.9681AD39B0@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <78959c88715049a4be00fc75bb333d3a@AcuMS.aculab.com>
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 09:17:47AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Kees Cook
> > Sent: 01 February 2022 00:10
> ...
> > While the initial code searches[6][7] turned up what appeared to be
> > mostly corner case tests, trying to that just reject argv == NULL
> > (or an immediately terminated pointer list) quickly started tripping[8]
> > existing userspace programs.
> >
> > The next best approach is forcing a single empty string into argv and
> > adjusting argc to match. The number of programs depending on argc == 0
> > seems a smaller set than those calling execve with a NULL argv.
>
> Has anyone considered using the pathname for argv[0]?
> So converting:
> execl(path, NULL);
> into:
> execl(path, path, NULL);
>
> I've not spotted any such suggestion.
It came up on some IRC discussions at some point. I'm personally not a
fan of this because it creates a bit of "new" ABI that has a lot of
variability (depending on "" is one thing, but depending on a "missing"
argv matching the exec path is very different). I think there were also
concerns about dealing with fd-based exec ("what is the 'right' name"),
etc.
I'd prefer we stay as simple as possible for this change.
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-02 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-01 0:09 [PATCH] exec: Force single empty string when argv is empty Kees Cook
2022-02-01 1:00 ` Ariadne Conill
2022-02-01 2:00 ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-02-01 9:17 ` David Laight
2022-02-02 20:31 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-02-01 13:22 ` Christian Brauner
2022-02-01 14:53 ` Rich Felker
2022-02-02 15:50 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-02 17:12 ` Rich Felker
2022-02-02 19:03 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202202021229.9681AD39B0@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ariadne@dereferenced.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).