linux-hardening.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Justin Forbes <jforbes@redhat.com>,
	Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>,
	Frank Eigler <fche@redhat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] gcc-plugins: Handle GCC version mismatch for OOT modules
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 03:49:35 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAReuB5zUq_7S8ZG25+tdQowECDOK1rApYvkPCpHhPjK5w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210302232649.y2tutffhxsblwqlb@treble>

On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 8:27 AM Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 02:42:10PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > When building out-of-tree kernel modules, the build system doesn't
> > require the GCC version to match the version used to build the original
> > kernel.  That's probably [1] fine.
> >
> > In fact, for many distros, the version of GCC used to build the latest
> > kernel doesn't necessarily match the latest released GCC, so a GCC
> > mismatch turns out to be pretty common.  And with CONFIG_MODVERSIONS
> > it's probably more common.
> >
> > So a lot of users have come to rely on being able to use a different
> > version of GCC when building OOT modules.
> >
> > But with GCC plugins enabled, that's no longer allowed:
> >
> >   cc1: error: incompatible gcc/plugin versions
> >   cc1: error: failed to initialize plugin ./scripts/gcc-plugins/structleak_plugin.so
> >
> > That error comes from the plugin's call to
> > plugin_default_version_check(), which strictly enforces the GCC version.
> > The strict check makes sense, because there's nothing to prevent the GCC
> > plugin ABI from changing -- and it often does.
> >
> > But failing the build isn't necessary.  For most plugins, OOT modules
> > will otherwise work just fine without the plugin instrumentation.
> >
> > When a GCC version mismatch is detected, print a warning and disable the
> > plugin.  The only exception is the RANDSTRUCT plugin which needs all
> > code to see the same struct layouts.  In that case print an error.
>
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> This problem is becoming more prevalent.  We will need to fix it one way
> or another, if we want to support distro adoption of these GCC
> plugin-based features.
>
> Frank suggested a possibly better idea: always rebuild the plugins when
> the GCC version changes.


That is just another form of the previous patch,
which was already rejected.


- That is a hack just for external modules
- Our consensus is, use the same version for the kernel and external modules



I use Ubuntu, and I do not see such a problem.
(I have never seen it on Debian either, except sid.)

I see Fedora providing GCC whose version is different
from the one used for building the kernel.
That is a problem on the distribution side.



In my ubuntu.

$ grep CC_VERSION_TEXT   /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build/.config
CONFIG_CC_VERSION_TEXT="gcc (Ubuntu 10.2.0-13ubuntu1) 10.2.0"
$ gcc --version  | head -n1
gcc (Ubuntu 10.2.0-13ubuntu1) 10.2.0



> What do you think?

NACK.


>  Any suggestions on how to
> implement that?  Otherwise I can try to hack something together.
>
> --
> Josh
>
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-04  0:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-25 20:42 [PATCH RFC] gcc-plugins: Handle GCC version mismatch for OOT modules Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-25 21:16 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-25 21:27   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-25 21:44     ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-25 22:07       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-26  8:13         ` Greg KH
2021-01-26 12:44           ` Justin Forbes
2021-01-26 13:51             ` Greg KH
2021-01-26 14:51               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-26 15:00                 ` Greg KH
2021-01-26 15:15                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-26 15:46                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-26 16:05                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-26 16:15                       ` Justin Forbes
2021-01-26 16:19                         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-26 17:06                           ` Greg KH
2021-01-26 17:47                             ` Justin Forbes
2021-01-26 16:22                       ` David Laight
2021-01-27 18:03             ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-26  8:12     ` Greg KH
2021-01-25 22:03 ` Kees Cook
2021-01-25 22:19   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-26 17:56     ` Kees Cook
2021-01-26 18:43       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-26 22:59         ` Kees Cook
2021-01-26 23:32           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-26  1:53   ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-26 12:16     ` David Laight
2021-01-27 18:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-27 18:38   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-27 18:43     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-27 18:51       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-27 22:09         ` David Laight
2021-01-28 14:29         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-28 15:45           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-03-02 23:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-03-03 18:49   ` Masahiro Yamada [this message]
2021-03-03 19:15     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-03-03 19:25       ` Linus Torvalds
2021-03-03 19:38         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-03-03 19:57           ` Linus Torvalds
2021-03-03 20:24             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-03-03 20:31               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-03-03 20:56               ` Linus Torvalds
2021-03-03 21:45                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-03-04 12:27                   ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-03-04 15:08                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-03-04 15:35                       ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-03-04 19:12                         ` Linus Torvalds
2021-03-05  2:41                           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-03-05  2:49                             ` Linus Torvalds
2021-03-05 16:03                             ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-03-05 19:18                               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-03-08  9:39                                 ` David Laight
2021-03-05 15:31                           ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-03-03 21:52             ` Kees Cook
2021-03-04 12:26       ` Masahiro Yamada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAK7LNAReuB5zUq_7S8ZG25+tdQowECDOK1rApYvkPCpHhPjK5w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=jforbes@redhat.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
    --cc=omosnace@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).