From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252C2C433F5 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 15:13:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345432AbiBBPNu (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2022 10:13:50 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52408 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1345460AbiBBPNs (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2022 10:13:48 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FC0EC061748; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 07:13:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id m14so38733541wrg.12; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 07:13:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=BKIYOgXf5K4p+GGgd7bYl/PT9+/8mk3LDQ6uvOqdAPQ=; b=q24wxtDg1Lcpl/X9SUx1BRm7NJXN+PWquOa3p+uAr9iubItg/s5Ykr/V1KU6qmBo+e IzwrM9WFixv/SDWs0I6aw8Yef9mIfh5X2orRJgqax7ThEcKjM4MJ1qZV0P5j/6Z+qM4g mSRkqTWlBqKmH15192c59yK4a9QuNLSKdmIjl8hdhDu0Smc+OyAgvUbNwUk1wlHykNjv WX/SPiKncYps/GVKZJnsia10vd3SN7rOgOkG0xwz7OX0mkmxAwdtWcFyFyaDMCoWdwqg 9R1VSBwMLpr/QQFz5l5ztOGCzqG9JbOvOebztCcx0JS9SQHpkC8cnmae4iyQdqMwin9j 25GQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=BKIYOgXf5K4p+GGgd7bYl/PT9+/8mk3LDQ6uvOqdAPQ=; b=hNyyvX2IlcUWF/o3QkgPqPS6iL5jDbScfpyv+4+9Q+72MZoclE5GRVFY/rJQk8krrB qO/xQA5wOchFmU9fApbbHiF2UQ5pNgkBp2AGMdjscCA4eG5yP6q6g+lb5/dC+RRAiFfG sTmP/ui+p/Dk47q9LsFgzMf5WNxokL/16MbUiA9fN1twsWEAD7lamyla5UxqXWPH0Qzw hjzFBw4TAed0N5hFws40BFveHK6+sDy9hQCm3PYP086Fl/tU0qrlxBhQpcEHGbztjdMB Q+c0BZSfU95MdRPtJRRuSIqg1/qXn+tnlPomk46FtM3qGoj1wU6RM4JyBIDDqF5jBFIx 9dFg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531FW02MEP49xpQzy8SNX4UibZYhvCpa5OZ/4o6h3HqGxPsX1k8I UwKTPJjzIfh9T+d4n0QlJw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzS8E1QCUjnW+GYPyzcTkdscJyLDrLr0/jk9roni0RReInLh+RHrLsFLlBBWGeqEq61AGP5zA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f344:: with SMTP id e4mr26779144wrp.362.1643814821893; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 07:13:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([46.53.252.48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m187sm4905052wme.25.2022.02.02.07.13.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 02 Feb 2022 07:13:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 18:13:39 +0300 From: Alexey Dobriyan To: Kees Cook Cc: Eric Biederman , Shuah Khan , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Ariadne Conill , Michael Kerrisk , Matthew Wilcox , Christian Brauner , Rich Felker , Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/exec: Avoid future NULL argv execve warning Message-ID: References: <20220201000807.2453486-1-keescook@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220201000807.2453486-1-keescook@chromium.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 04:08:07PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > Build actual argv for launching recursion test to avoid future warning > about using an empty argv in execve(). > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/exec/recursion-depth.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/exec/recursion-depth.c > @@ -24,8 +24,14 @@ > #include > #include > > +#define FILENAME "/tmp/1" > +#define HASHBANG "#!" FILENAME "\n" > + > int main(void) > { > + char * const argv[] = { FILENAME, NULL }; > + int rv; Can we move out of -Wdeclaration-after-statement mentality in tests at least? > - int rv = execve(FILENAME, NULL, NULL); > + rv = execve(FILENAME, argv, NULL); int rv = execve(FILENAME, (char*[]){FILENAME, NULL}, NULL); is cleaner (and modern)! > if (rv == -1 && errno == ELOOP) { > return 0; > }