From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=pQ84=SS=vger.kernel.org=linux-hwmon-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A4CC10F13
	for <linux-hwmon@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:20:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324A820684
	for <linux-hwmon@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:20:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1729301AbfDPUTw (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-hwmon@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:19:52 -0400
Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:40314 "EHLO ms.lwn.net"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1728000AbfDPUTw (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:19:52 -0400
Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1E9D537;
        Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:19:50 +0000 (UTC)
Date:   Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:19:49 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] Convert hwmon documentation to ReST
Message-ID: <20190416141949.09b48789@lwn.net>
In-Reply-To: <f900adea-d231-c00d-847c-33e66e79ea30@roeck-us.net>
References: <cover.1554923967.git.mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
        <20190411124324.3ed62fad@lwn.net>
        <20190411174357.251904f5@coco.lan>
        <20190411210731.GA29378@roeck-us.net>
        <20190412100451.6fe49de7@lwn.net>
        <f900adea-d231-c00d-847c-33e66e79ea30@roeck-us.net>
Organization: LWN.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-hwmon-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-hwmon.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 20:09:16 -0700
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:

> The big real-world question is: Is the series good enough for you to accept,
> or do you expect some level of user/kernel separation ?

I guess it can go in; it's forward progress, even if it doesn't make the
improvements I would like to see.

The real question, I guess, is who should take it.  I've been seeing a
fair amount of activity on hwmon, so I suspect that the potential for
conflicts is real.  Perhaps things would go smoother if it went through
your tree?

Thanks,

jon