From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FAD8C76196 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:12:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A9422322 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="TcKFPTOl" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728860AbfGVJMz (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 05:12:55 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:51220 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727797AbfGVJMz (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 05:12:55 -0400 Received: from nazgul.tnic (87-126-252-198.ip.btc-net.bg [87.126.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id A29FD1EC0BED; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 11:12:53 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1563786774; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=FjGxKThtP9zHEnA4HhkC20MsNqqgUUGVANPSAgauy10=; b=TcKFPTOldisgk5rL5fDRSGCZf59TbNb4FzGmJDDSI8AcDU416FRm+FnopjwJVBQCtHH1x5 DeEwn1uxw2uPaK6nUdEPwWjlIWKhEMmsOcjTy55Krs1Ulfun0VC6sqrznssbk/10NcbI21 kAQIu1MCpeyChE+sRPBvCpAaWo09MRI= Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 11:12:45 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Thomas Gleixner , "Woods, Brian" Cc: Guenter Roeck , Marcel Bocu , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, Clemens Ladisch , Jean Delvare , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Vicki Pfau Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/amd_nb: Add PCI device IDs for family 17h, model 71h Message-ID: <20190722091245.GA23240@nazgul.tnic> References: <20190718182617.6964-1-marcel.p.bocu@gmail.com> <20190718193330.GA23809@roeck-us.net> <690c10a3-0f5f-6ba7-9dc9-b7150b300dd1@gmail.com> <91c6b4cb-2ae4-c2fb-faf4-110b2c426901@roeck-us.net> <33703f78-c704-b904-8643-59a1fb1849fa@gmail.com> <20190719160840.GA26100@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-hwmon-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 10:59:32AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jul 2019, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > We could merge his patches (if he contacted the x86 crew), make a v2 of > > > mine (71h -> 70h, add his Signed-off-by?) and merge, or some other option? > > > > > Either case, we'll need feedback from x86 maintainers. They are not exactly > > happy if anyone pushes a patch into arch/x86 without their approval. > > Adding those PCI ids looks straight forward. So feel free to route them > through hwmon with: ... but before you do that, let's wait for Brian to confirm the proper model range. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. --