From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C70C54EAA for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 13:09:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233213AbjA0NJF (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 08:09:05 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51686 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232874AbjA0NI7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 08:08:59 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-x329.google.com (mail-ot1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::329]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 210797EFD3; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 05:08:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ot1-x329.google.com with SMTP id t7-20020a05683014c700b006864760b1caso2136092otq.0; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 05:08:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Mdj6XOXFYUD1vp/9oZxmYr9pvWZQw2WEe+CA+3BAP4Y=; b=HE7J2owfGbAbSkpRZeozNoCsXC+J81kBqfsK8pIWlCSET6mEroNNdRUSsgrIbiBgQi tuHlZTH60bec4njROd0iktdzdhKOitwrvR9h3amqUnULyQ1nWdNCv1kGylMxVcxvJkiD PCNpsyzEMG9zUlJb9/3P+k8jiFtrkiWK0Vo029zCFdMgH6spKf/d11MeqET1TR8S58or +i04eWALkuqHzMBklcXHmh869ny0fGvPXEf5Wj4bGXLQ9ydHDGs+EwLkH0Ng7gAu79kH yELMOSU3h4jf4xwJ17wiDijk39jEXiWipCuecZiVW6jlrA26WIAVMXmX25+Kdku7fY/B XrGQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Mdj6XOXFYUD1vp/9oZxmYr9pvWZQw2WEe+CA+3BAP4Y=; b=PibJ8y1yRh3dyVxH/kpKZHNB7RijXC5W2mM67YrWhCxC4umygBrqYawZvVAadm8CUK G7sric6UpoayXrhbE6/qDZ/RQVP41WJQb1vYUiokbqLEwaC2dxANIY32SPCAAtB/dBxQ UraT8SHnOlAV9pfE64Qub5G1t+mtUUrRffhb/dC+4G0Ovm904BEBM5CtBgmttpWf6cWl GWFSEw7Io//aSybVTnSMjDx9ttTUrzzIEQq3DEGC56hjNNEjKuZnAkadGt6IUmhA3vYp sedVs5OpqZJwTBa78/BsRMp3h7bmKMUYNdEW+UOnGjArhFwPy/9DETXFXDDp3UKb0LBn wJiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKUKgN/E3JF5X1Uj/zFbjbgiQnB014U36m4PovvOPft8CYCZWazJ 4dfsFA4gy+I5NYoRO6pyeJY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8S1SktctHbWEPubzDmfHK/SBZ+yY3SR7xFMZb5s8qapgvVZVTa1oDP0nrDxGe6DSVBU2esDA== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:65d3:0:b0:68b:9c22:19cd with SMTP id z19-20020a9d65d3000000b0068b9c2219cdmr729449oth.28.1674824898154; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 05:08:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t18-20020a9d66d2000000b0068b93a70d73sm549414otm.52.2023.01.27.05.08.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 05:08:17 -0800 (PST) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 05:08:15 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: Armin Wolf Cc: hdegoede@redhat.com, markgross@kernel.org, jdelvare@suse.com, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] platform/x86: dell-ddv: Add hwmon support Message-ID: <20230127130815.GA3911997@roeck-us.net> References: <20230126194021.381092-1-W_Armin@gmx.de> <20230126194021.381092-6-W_Armin@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20230126194021.381092-6-W_Armin@gmx.de> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 08:40:21PM +0100, Armin Wolf wrote: > Thanks to bugreport 216655 on bugzilla triggered by the > dell-smm-hwmon driver, the contents of the sensor buffers > could be almost completely decoded. > Add an hwmon interface for exposing the fan and thermal > sensor values. The debugfs interface remains in place to > aid in reverse-engineering of unknown sensor types > and the thermal buffer. > > Tested-by: Antonín Skala > Tested-by: Gustavo Walbon > Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf > --- > drivers/platform/x86/dell/Kconfig | 1 + > drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-wmi-ddv.c | 435 ++++++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 435 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/x86/dell/Kconfig > index d319de8f2132..21a74b63d9b1 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell/Kconfig > @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ config DELL_WMI_DDV > default m > depends on ACPI_BATTERY > depends on ACPI_WMI > + depends on HWMON Not sure if adding such a dependency is a good idea. Up to the maintainer to decide. Personally I would prefer something like depends on HWMON || HWMON=n and some conditionals in the code, as it is done with other drivers outside the hwmon directory. > help > This option adds support for WMI-based sensors like > battery temperature sensors found on some Dell notebooks. > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-wmi-ddv.c b/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-wmi-ddv.c > index 9695bf493ea6..5b30bb85199e 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-wmi-ddv.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-wmi-ddv.c > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -21,10 +22,13 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > > #include > > +#include > + > #define DRIVER_NAME "dell-wmi-ddv" > > #define DELL_DDV_SUPPORTED_VERSION_MIN 2 > @@ -63,6 +67,29 @@ enum dell_ddv_method { > DELL_DDV_THERMAL_SENSOR_INFORMATION = 0x22, > }; > > +struct fan_sensor_entry { > + u8 type; > + __le16 rpm; > +} __packed; > + > +struct thermal_sensor_entry { > + u8 type; > + s8 now; > + s8 min; > + s8 max; > + u8 unknown; > +} __packed; > + > +struct combined_channel_info { > + struct hwmon_channel_info info; > + u32 config[]; > +}; > + > +struct combined_chip_info { > + struct hwmon_chip_info chip; > + const struct hwmon_channel_info *info[]; > +}; > + > struct dell_wmi_ddv_data { > struct acpi_battery_hook hook; > struct device_attribute temp_attr; > @@ -70,6 +97,24 @@ struct dell_wmi_ddv_data { > struct wmi_device *wdev; > }; > > +static const char * const fan_labels[] = { > + "CPU Fan", > + "Chassis Motherboard Fan", > + "Video Fan", > + "Power Supply Fan", > + "Chipset Fan", > + "Memory Fan", > + "PCI Fan", > + "HDD Fan", > +}; > + > +static const char * const fan_dock_labels[] = { > + "Docking Chassis/Motherboard Fan", > + "Docking Video Fan", > + "Docking Power Supply Fan", > + "Docking Chipset Fan", > +}; > + > static int dell_wmi_ddv_query_type(struct wmi_device *wdev, enum dell_ddv_method method, u32 arg, > union acpi_object **result, acpi_object_type type) > { > @@ -171,6 +216,386 @@ static int dell_wmi_ddv_query_string(struct wmi_device *wdev, enum dell_ddv_meth > return dell_wmi_ddv_query_type(wdev, method, arg, result, ACPI_TYPE_STRING); > } > > +static int dell_wmi_ddv_query_sensors(struct wmi_device *wdev, enum dell_ddv_method method, > + size_t entry_size, union acpi_object **result, u64 *count) > +{ > + union acpi_object *obj; > + u64 buffer_size; > + u8 *buffer; > + int ret; > + > + ret = dell_wmi_ddv_query_buffer(wdev, method, 0, &obj); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + buffer_size = obj->package.elements[0].integer.value; > + buffer = obj->package.elements[1].buffer.pointer; > + if (buffer_size % entry_size != 1 || buffer[buffer_size - 1] != 0xff) { > + kfree(obj); > + Stray empty line > + return -ENOMSG; > + } > + > + *count = (buffer_size - 1) / entry_size; > + *result = obj; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static umode_t dell_wmi_ddv_is_visible(const void *drvdata, enum hwmon_sensor_types type, u32 attr, > + int channel) > +{ > + return 0444; > +} > + > +static int dell_wmi_ddv_fan_read_channel(struct dell_wmi_ddv_data *data, u32 attr, int channel, > + long *val) > +{ > + struct fan_sensor_entry *entry; > + union acpi_object *obj; > + u64 count; > + int ret; > + > + ret = dell_wmi_ddv_query_sensors(data->wdev, DELL_DDV_FAN_SENSOR_INFORMATION, > + sizeof(*entry), &obj, &count); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + entry = (struct fan_sensor_entry *)obj->package.elements[1].buffer.pointer; > + if (count > channel) { > + switch (attr) { > + case hwmon_fan_input: > + *val = get_unaligned_le16(&entry[channel].rpm); > + Another stray empty line. I see that "empty line before return or break" is common. Looks odd to me, and I don't see the point (it confuses the code flow for me and lets my brain focus on the empty line instead of the code in question), but I guess that is PoV. I won't comment on it further and let the maintainer decide. > + break; > + default: > + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; > + } > + } else { > + ret = -ENXIO; > + } Error handling should come first. > + > + kfree(obj); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int dell_wmi_ddv_temp_read_channel(struct dell_wmi_ddv_data *data, u32 attr, int channel, > + long *val) > +{ > + struct thermal_sensor_entry *entry; > + union acpi_object *obj; > + u64 count; > + int ret; > + > + ret = dell_wmi_ddv_query_sensors(data->wdev, DELL_DDV_THERMAL_SENSOR_INFORMATION, > + sizeof(*entry), &obj, &count); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + entry = (struct thermal_sensor_entry *)obj->package.elements[1].buffer.pointer; > + if (count > channel) { This is a bit of Joda programming. It is really "channel < count", ie the requested channel number is in the range of channels reported by the WMI code. PoV, of course, but I find that the above makes the code more difficult to read. > + switch (attr) { > + case hwmon_temp_input: > + *val = entry[channel].now * 1000; > + > + break; > + case hwmon_temp_min: > + *val = entry[channel].min * 1000; > + > + break; > + case hwmon_temp_max: > + *val = entry[channel].max * 1000; > + > + break; > + default: > + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; break; missing > + } > + } else { > + ret = -ENXIO; > + } Same as above - error handling should come first. > + > + kfree(obj); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int dell_wmi_ddv_read(struct device *dev, enum hwmon_sensor_types type, u32 attr, > + int channel, long *val) > +{ > + struct dell_wmi_ddv_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > + > + switch (type) { > + case hwmon_fan: > + return dell_wmi_ddv_fan_read_channel(data, attr, channel, val); > + case hwmon_temp: > + return dell_wmi_ddv_temp_read_channel(data, attr, channel, val); > + default: > + break; > + } > + > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > +} > + > +static int dell_wmi_ddv_fan_read_string(struct dell_wmi_ddv_data *data, int channel, > + const char **str) > +{ > + struct fan_sensor_entry *entry; > + union acpi_object *obj; > + u64 count; > + u8 type; > + int ret; > + > + ret = dell_wmi_ddv_query_sensors(data->wdev, DELL_DDV_FAN_SENSOR_INFORMATION, > + sizeof(*entry), &obj, &count); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + entry = (struct fan_sensor_entry *)obj->package.elements[1].buffer.pointer; > + if (count > channel) { > + type = entry[channel].type; > + > + switch (type) { > + case 0x00 ... 0x07: > + *str = fan_labels[type]; > + > + break; > + case 0x11 ... 0x14: > + *str = fan_dock_labels[type - 0x11]; > + > + break; > + default: > + *str = "Unknown Fan"; break; missing. > + } > + } else { > + ret = -ENXIO; > + } And again. > + > + kfree(obj); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int dell_wmi_ddv_temp_read_string(struct dell_wmi_ddv_data *data, int channel, > + const char **str) > +{ > + struct thermal_sensor_entry *entry; > + union acpi_object *obj; > + u64 count; > + int ret; > + > + ret = dell_wmi_ddv_query_sensors(data->wdev, DELL_DDV_THERMAL_SENSOR_INFORMATION, > + sizeof(*entry), &obj, &count); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + entry = (struct thermal_sensor_entry *)obj->package.elements[1].buffer.pointer; > + if (count > channel) { > + switch (entry[channel].type) { > + case 0x00: > + *str = "CPU"; > + > + break; > + case 0x11: > + *str = "Video"; > + > + break; > + case 0x22: > + *str = "Memory"; // sometimes called DIMM Personally I don't permit C++ style comments in a hwmon driver unless _all_ comments are C++ style. Just a remark here. > + > + break; > + case 0x33: > + *str = "Other"; > + > + break; > + case 0x44: > + *str = "Ambient"; // sometimes called SKIN > + > + break; > + case 0x52: > + *str = "SODIMM"; > + > + break; > + case 0x55: > + *str = "HDD"; > + > + break; > + case 0x62: > + *str = "SODIMM 2"; > + > + break; > + case 0x73: > + *str = "NB"; > + > + break; > + case 0x83: > + *str = "Charger"; > + > + break; > + case 0xbb: > + *str = "Memory 3"; > + > + break; > + default: > + *str = "Unknown"; break; missing Ok, I guess this is on purpose. I personally don't permit that since it always leaves the question if it was on purpose or not. > + } > + } else { > + ret = -ENXIO; > + } > + > + kfree(obj); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int dell_wmi_ddv_read_string(struct device *dev, enum hwmon_sensor_types type, u32 attr, > + int channel, const char **str) > +{ > + struct dell_wmi_ddv_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > + > + switch (type) { > + case hwmon_fan: > + switch (attr) { > + case hwmon_fan_label: > + return dell_wmi_ddv_fan_read_string(data, channel, str); > + default: > + break; > + } > + break; > + case hwmon_temp: > + switch (attr) { > + case hwmon_temp_label: > + return dell_wmi_ddv_temp_read_string(data, channel, str); > + default: > + break; > + } > + break; > + default: > + break; > + } > + > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > +} > + > +static const struct hwmon_ops dell_wmi_ddv_ops = { > + .is_visible = dell_wmi_ddv_is_visible, > + .read = dell_wmi_ddv_read, > + .read_string = dell_wmi_ddv_read_string, > +}; > + > +static struct hwmon_channel_info *dell_wmi_ddv_channel_create(struct device *dev, u64 count, > + enum hwmon_sensor_types type, > + u32 config) > +{ > + struct combined_channel_info *cinfo; > + int i; > + > + cinfo = devm_kzalloc(dev, struct_size(cinfo, config, count + 1), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!cinfo) > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > + > + cinfo->info.type = type; > + cinfo->info.config = cinfo->config; > + > + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) > + cinfo->config[i] = config; > + > + return &cinfo->info; > +} > + > +static struct hwmon_channel_info *dell_wmi_ddv_channel_init(struct wmi_device *wdev, > + enum dell_ddv_method method, > + size_t entry_size, > + enum hwmon_sensor_types type, > + u32 config) > +{ > + union acpi_object *obj; > + u64 count; > + int ret; > + > + ret = dell_wmi_ddv_query_sensors(wdev, method, entry_size, &obj, &count); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ERR_PTR(ret); > + > + kfree(obj); > + > + if (!count) > + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); > + > + return dell_wmi_ddv_channel_create(&wdev->dev, count, type, config); > +} > + > +static int dell_wmi_ddv_hwmon_add(struct dell_wmi_ddv_data *data) > +{ > + struct wmi_device *wdev = data->wdev; > + struct combined_chip_info *cinfo; > + struct device *hdev; > + int index = 0; > + int ret; > + > + if (!devres_open_group(&wdev->dev, dell_wmi_ddv_hwmon_add, GFP_KERNEL)) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + cinfo = devm_kzalloc(&wdev->dev, struct_size(cinfo, info, 4), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!cinfo) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + > + goto err_release; > + } > + > + cinfo->chip.ops = &dell_wmi_ddv_ops; > + cinfo->chip.info = cinfo->info; > + > + cinfo->info[index] = dell_wmi_ddv_channel_create(&wdev->dev, 1, hwmon_chip, > + HWMON_C_REGISTER_TZ); > + > + if (IS_ERR(cinfo->info[index])) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(cinfo->info[index]); > + > + goto err_release; > + } > + > + index++; > + > + cinfo->info[index] = dell_wmi_ddv_channel_init(wdev, DELL_DDV_FAN_SENSOR_INFORMATION, > + sizeof(struct fan_sensor_entry), hwmon_fan, > + (HWMON_F_INPUT | HWMON_F_LABEL)); > + if (!IS_ERR(cinfo->info[index])) > + index++; > + > + cinfo->info[index] = dell_wmi_ddv_channel_init(wdev, DELL_DDV_THERMAL_SENSOR_INFORMATION, > + sizeof(struct thermal_sensor_entry), > + hwmon_temp, (HWMON_T_INPUT | HWMON_T_MIN | > + HWMON_T_MAX | HWMON_T_LABEL)); > + if (!IS_ERR(cinfo->info[index])) > + index++; > + > + if (!index) { > + ret = -ENODEV; > + > + goto err_release; > + } > + > + cinfo->info[index] = NULL; > + > + hdev = devm_hwmon_device_register_with_info(&wdev->dev, "dell_ddv", data, &cinfo->chip, > + NULL); > + if (IS_ERR(hdev)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(hdev); > + > + goto err_release; > + } > + > + devres_close_group(&wdev->dev, dell_wmi_ddv_hwmon_add); > + > + return 0; > + > +err_release: > + devres_release_group(&wdev->dev, dell_wmi_ddv_hwmon_add); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > static int dell_wmi_ddv_battery_index(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev, u32 *index) > { > const char *uid_str; > @@ -370,7 +795,15 @@ static int dell_wmi_ddv_probe(struct wmi_device *wdev, const void *context) > > dell_wmi_ddv_debugfs_init(wdev); > > - return dell_wmi_ddv_battery_add(data); > + ret = dell_wmi_ddv_hwmon_add(data); > + if (ret < 0) > + dev_dbg(&wdev->dev, "Unable to register hwmon interface: %d\n", ret); > + > + ret = dell_wmi_ddv_battery_add(data); > + if (ret < 0) > + dev_dbg(&wdev->dev, "Unable to register acpi battery hook: %d\n", ret); > + This used to be an error, but no longer is. Not my call to make if this is acceptable, just pointing it out. > + return 0; > } > > static const struct wmi_device_id dell_wmi_ddv_id_table[] = { > -- > 2.30.2 >