From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB1FC433E0 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 16:38:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042E720870 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 16:38:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="jo67aa/l" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726924AbgGBQil (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2020 12:38:41 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39410 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726770AbgGBQik (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2020 12:38:40 -0400 Received: from mail-ua1-x942.google.com (mail-ua1-x942.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::942]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF27CC08C5DD for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 09:38:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ua1-x942.google.com with SMTP id q15so8914787uap.4 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 09:38:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FEtyZGHGPJIZFNjI/Ip4xEzWQIwRU4IYgLEED0Ona/I=; b=jo67aa/lHzYqjfYskLWKW5quEITA5FiC6PWEwsrYI0aMCYXg4HY7LncYRG9WkKyXDj 7BOU8BGXvkvEN2Q3XjgBl5MKhKWUMKGtaCA7meltTOvUmo0nm1QZurL7IYfJGwqnR8dm c41ogPba76PP5CTQrvGAHBqF70Qu9M4yFRZSG7CUKlo+tp0GsaGMt79ZKwyBgAr6NDiK rGrUPl8FW4kvGT+0gKpgTOHJ1422EOyUD/ab/axNgRiQMdrLLFYdTkHa6uKWZZsl87iE +3pVhBssylZ8qgB4tO80LGaZAdWXdcmPQqF2rc6o4BbLErNMrD9Apy3l5feTNLqbmDOP QBxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FEtyZGHGPJIZFNjI/Ip4xEzWQIwRU4IYgLEED0Ona/I=; b=hn06BjeB03cBW8i+SNZcRbDQu2QX5pnPPhfKOYyu3JqQ4hFSx8g3+/yLhXmCxw1l6S oQrEPTJ6CSGaI5WrE6fFtc3/PnDMiX8xb6Pt9dSbrFdfPvQ082NII+LmNzP0mjb9gclP p1kIAQzffQsuQfkbQfHqCfxzhI9p2ZwL6d2SgE9vZkwce0SQyEwaV5hjTqzHR6EOtlzN P5f36JyvcZQ41qzZ1i1dvwXraE5qWA9AkvQvNjeB0kG+iRnLysEC9ZbHsr8ETsOIZsXD Aa1ojvfm6l0ESYID/h9kADNR3CkCtG3B5vvX/HBAzup/w3m4HmRrxOK2OQaeJ2s3l8o1 +Dhw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531lUBrRj204TYpkhFycXd8Wa5d2EtZieu6zNf+CKPcr2iSGd0b0 CfMAvoflVOdb9CAF0CJBX/8IJQvc5TnOipphIvPqPQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzy3R8feg5WOHFZEWnBC021WeM1muKk3BvjvajYrjfmItC3J16JyyfE80+c2pVrKZr1W0y8O2p4UVxT2Y/Hars= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:6510:: with SMTP id w16mr14005307uam.97.1593707919367; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 09:38:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200630174350.2842555-1-linchuyuan@google.com> <20200702014223.4096977-1-linchuyuan@google.com> <20200702051453.GA235128@roeck-us.net> In-Reply-To: <20200702051453.GA235128@roeck-us.net> From: Chu Lin Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 09:38:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon:max6697: Allow max6581 to create tempX_offset attributes To: Guenter Roeck Cc: jdelvare@suse.com, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Ling , Kais Belgaied , Zhongqi Li Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-hwmon-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 10:14 PM Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 01:42:23AM +0000, Chu Lin wrote: > > Per max6581, reg 4d and reg 4e is used for temperature read offset. > > This patch will let the user specify the temperature read offset for > > max6581. This patch is tested on max6581 and only applies to max6581. > > > Patchwork received four versions of this patch, with two different > subject lines. > > How am I supposed to know which one to look at ? Sorry for the confusion. I was learning how to send amendments to a patch and forget that it may create confusion for the reviewers. The latest one with headline hwmon:max6697: Allow max6581 to create tempX_offset attributes is the one that should be reviewed. Chu