From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
"linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 21:32:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190722193251.GF6698@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58DA0841-33C2-4D16-A671-08064A15001C@vmware.com>
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 07:27:09PM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote:
> > On Jul 22, 2019, at 12:14 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > But then we can still do something like the below, which doesn't change
> > things and still gets rid of that dual function crud, simplifying
> > smp_call_function_many again.
> Nice! I will add it on top, if you don’t mind (instead squashing it).
Not at all.
> The original decision to have local/remote functions was mostly to provide
> the generality.
>
> I would change the last argument of __smp_call_function_many() from “wait”
> to “flags” that would indicate whether to run the function locally, since I
> don’t want to change the semantics of smp_call_function_many() and decide
> whether to run the function locally purely based on the mask. Let me know if
> you disagree.
Agreed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-22 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-19 0:58 [PATCH v3 0/9] x86: Concurrent TLB flushes Nadav Amit
2019-07-19 0:58 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently Nadav Amit
2019-07-22 19:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-22 19:27 ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-22 19:32 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-07-26 7:28 ` Juergen Gross
2019-07-31 0:13 ` Michael Kelley
2019-07-19 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] x86: Concurrent TLB flushes Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190722193251.GF6698@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).