linux-hyperv.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
	Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
	olaf@aepfle.de, apw@canonical.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	vkuznets@redhat.com, marcelo.cerri@canonical.com,
	jackm@mellanox.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] PCI/PM: Run resume fixups before disabling wakeup events
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 18:00:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191014230016.240912-5-helgaas@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191014230016.240912-1-helgaas@kernel.org>

From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

pci_pm_resume() and pci_pm_restore() call pci_pm_default_resume(), which
runs resume fixups before disabling wakeup events:

  static void pci_pm_default_resume(struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
  {
    pci_fixup_device(pci_fixup_resume, pci_dev);
    pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false);
  }

pci_pm_runtime_resume() does both of these, but in the opposite order:

  pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false);
  pci_fixup_device(pci_fixup_resume, pci_dev);

We should always use the same ordering unless there's a reason to do
otherwise.  Change pci_pm_runtime_resume() to call pci_pm_default_resume()
instead of open-coding this, so the fixups are always done before disabling
wakeup events.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
---
 drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
index 0c3086793e4e..55acb658273f 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
@@ -1345,8 +1345,7 @@ static int pci_pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
 		return 0;
 
 	pci_fixup_device(pci_fixup_resume_early, pci_dev);
-	pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D0, false);
-	pci_fixup_device(pci_fixup_resume, pci_dev);
+	pci_pm_default_resume(pci_dev);
 
 	if (pm && pm->runtime_resume)
 		rc = pm->runtime_resume(dev);
-- 
2.23.0.700.g56cf767bdb-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-14 23:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-14 23:00 [PATCH v3 0/7] PCI: PM: Move to D0 before calling pci_legacy_resume_early() Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-14 23:00 ` [PATCH 1/7] PCI/PM: Always return devices to D0 when thawing Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-15 17:15   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-14 23:00 ` [PATCH 2/7] PCI/PM: Correct pci_pm_thaw_noirq() documentation Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-15 17:17   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-14 23:00 ` [PATCH 3/7] PCI/PM: Clear PCIe PME Status even for legacy power management Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-15 17:20   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-14 23:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2019-10-15 17:21   ` [PATCH 4/7] PCI/PM: Run resume fixups before disabling wakeup events Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-14 23:00 ` [PATCH 5/7] PCI/PM: Make power management op coding style consistent Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-15 17:22   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-16 13:50   ` Dan Carpenter
2019-10-14 23:00 ` [PATCH 6/7] PCI/PM: Wrap long lines in documentation Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-15 17:23   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-14 23:00 ` [PATCH 7/7] PCI/MSI: Move power state check out of pci_msi_supported() Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-15 17:24   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-15 18:24 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] PCI: PM: Move to D0 before calling pci_legacy_resume_early() Dexuan Cui
2019-10-15 18:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191014230016.240912-5-helgaas@kernel.org \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=jackm@mellanox.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=marcelo.cerri@canonical.com \
    --cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
    --cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).