linux-hyperv.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	"lantianyu1986@gmail.com" <lantianyu1986@gmail.com>,
	KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
	"sashal@kernel.org" <sashal@kernel.org>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
	"linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	vkuznets <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	"eric.devolder@oracle.com" <eric.devolder@oracle.com>,
	"vbabka@suse.cz" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	"osalvador@suse.de" <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Pasha Tatashin <Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com>,
	"rppt@linux.ibm.com" <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [RFC PATCH V2 2/10] mm: expose is_mem_section_removable() symbol
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 10:50:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200114095057.GK19428@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SG2P153MB0349F85FB0C1C02F55391F6D92350@SG2P153MB0349.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

On Mon 13-01-20 14:49:38, Tianyu Lan wrote:
> Hi David & Michal:
> 	Thanks for your review. Some memory blocks are not suitable for hot-plug.
> If not check memory block's removable, offline_pages() will report some failure error
> e.g, "failed due to memory holes" and  "failure to isolate range". I think the check maybe
> added into offline_and_remove_memory()? This may help to not create/expose a new
> interface to do such check in module.

Why is a log message a problem in the first place. The operation has
failed afterall. Does the driver try to offline an arbitrary memory?
Could you describe your usecase in more details please?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-14  9:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-07 13:09 [RFC PATCH V2 00/10] x86/Hyper-V: Add Dynamic memory hot-remove function lantianyu1986
2020-01-07 13:09 ` [RFC PATCH V2 1/10] mm/resource: Move child to new resource when release mem region lantianyu1986
2020-01-20 18:34   ` Michael Kelley
2020-01-20 19:20   ` Michael Kelley
2020-01-07 13:09 ` [RFC PATCH V2 2/10] mm: expose is_mem_section_removable() symbol lantianyu1986
2020-01-07 13:36   ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-10 13:41     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-13 14:49       ` [EXTERNAL] " Tianyu Lan
2020-01-13 15:01         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-14  9:50         ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2020-01-17 16:35           ` Tianyu Lan
2020-01-20 14:14             ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-07 13:09 ` [RFC PATCH V2 3/10] x86/Hyper-V/Balloon: Replace hot-add and balloon up works with a common work lantianyu1986
2020-01-20 19:12   ` Michael Kelley
2020-01-07 13:09 ` [RFC PATCH V2 4/10] x86/Hyper-V/Balloon: Convert spin lock ha_lock to mutex lantianyu1986
2020-01-07 13:09 ` [RFC PATCH V2 5/10] x86/Hyper-V/Balloon: Avoid releasing ha_lock when traverse ha_region_list lantianyu1986
2020-01-07 13:09 ` [RFC PATCH V2 6/10] x86/Hyper-V/Balloon: Enable mem hot-remove capability lantianyu1986
2020-01-07 13:09 ` [RFC PATCH V2 7/10] x86/Hyper-V/Balloon: Handle mem hot-remove request lantianyu1986
2020-01-07 13:09 ` [RFC PATCH V2 8/10] x86/Hyper-V/Balloon: Handle request with non-aligned page number lantianyu1986
2020-01-07 13:09 ` [RFC PATCH V2 9/10] x86/Hyper-V/Balloon: Hot add mem in the gaps of hot add region lantianyu1986
2020-01-07 13:09 ` [RFC PATCH V2 10/10] x86/Hyper-V: Workaround Hyper-V unballoon msg bug lantianyu1986

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200114095057.GK19428@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.devolder@oracle.com \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=lantianyu1986@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).