From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643B6C43461 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 09:06:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371962078D for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 09:06:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726458AbgIOJGo (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 05:06:44 -0400 Received: from out30-43.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.43]:56036 "EHLO out30-43.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726142AbgIOJGS (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 05:06:18 -0400 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R971e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e04394;MF=richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=18;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0U90pcMF_1600160772; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0U90pcMF_1600160772) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:06:12 +0800 Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:06:12 +0800 From: Wei Yang To: David Hildenbrand Cc: Wei Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , Dan Williams , Jason Gunthorpe , Kees Cook , Ard Biesheuvel , Pankaj Gupta , Baoquan He Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] kernel/resource: make release_mem_region_adjustable() never fail Message-ID: <20200915090612.GA6936@L-31X9LVDL-1304.local> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <20200908201012.44168-1-david@redhat.com> <20200908201012.44168-2-david@redhat.com> <20200915021012.GC2007@L-31X9LVDL-1304.local> <927904b1-1909-f11f-483e-8012bda8ad0c@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <927904b1-1909-f11f-483e-8012bda8ad0c@redhat.com> Sender: linux-hyperv-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 09:35:30AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > >>> static int __ref try_remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size) >>> { >>> int rc = 0; >>> @@ -1777,7 +1757,7 @@ static int __ref try_remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size) >>> memblock_remove(start, size); >>> } >>> >>> - __release_memory_resource(start, size); >>> + release_mem_region_adjustable(&iomem_resource, start, size); >>> >> >> Seems the only user of release_mem_region_adjustable() is here, can we move >> iomem_resource into the function body? Actually, we don't iterate the resource >> tree from any level. We always start from the root. > >You mean, making iomem_resource implicit? I can spot that something >similar was done for > >#define devm_release_mem_region(dev, start, n) \ > __devm_release_region(dev, &iomem_resource, (start), (n)) > What I prefer is remove iomem_resource from the parameter list. Just use is in the function body. For the example you listed, __release_region() would have varies of *parent*, which looks reasonable to keep it here. >I'll send an addon patch for that, ok? - thanks. > >-- >Thanks, > >David / dhildenb -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me