linux-hyperv.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, x86@kernel.org
Cc: iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] irqdomain: Add max_affinity argument to irq_domain_alloc_descs()
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 08:54:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e1aa9c1c2b01c570093fb8d59773d92ece1618a.camel@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878scgx546.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3735 bytes --]

On Thu, 2020-10-08 at 14:40 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Subject: x86/iommu: Make interrupt remapping more robust
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 14:09:44 +0200
> 
> Needs to be split into pieces and cover PCI proper. Right now PCI gets a
> NULL pointer assigned which makes it explode at the wrong place
> later. Also hyperv iommu wants some love.
> 
> NOT-Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c      |    4 +++-
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c          |   24 ++++++++++++++----------
>  drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c           |    6 +++---
>  drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c |    4 ++--
>  4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> @@ -2300,7 +2300,9 @@ static int mp_irqdomain_create(int ioapi
>         info.type = X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_IOAPIC_GET_PARENT;
>         info.devid = mpc_ioapic_id(ioapic);
>         parent = irq_remapping_get_irq_domain(&info);
> -       if (!parent)
> +       if (IS_ERR(parent))
> +               return PTR_ERR(parent);
> +       else if (!parent)
>                 parent = x86_vector_domain;
>         else
>                 name = "IO-APIC-IR";
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c
> @@ -415,9 +415,9 @@ static struct msi_domain_info hpet_msi_d
>  struct irq_domain *hpet_create_irq_domain(int hpet_id)
>  {
>         struct msi_domain_info *domain_info;
> +       struct fwnode_handle *fn = NULL;
>         struct irq_domain *parent, *d;
>         struct irq_alloc_info info;
> -       struct fwnode_handle *fn;
>  
>         if (x86_vector_domain == NULL)
>                 return NULL;
> @@ -432,25 +432,29 @@ struct irq_domain *hpet_create_irq_domai
>         init_irq_alloc_info(&info, NULL);
>         info.type = X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_HPET_GET_PARENT;
>         info.devid = hpet_id;
> +
>         parent = irq_remapping_get_irq_domain(&info);
> -       if (parent == NULL)
> +       if (IS_ERR(parent))
> +               goto fail;
> +       else if (!parent)
>                 parent = x86_vector_domain;
>         else
>                 hpet_msi_controller.name = "IR-HPET-MSI";

Hrm... this is the '-ENODEV changes' that you wanted me to pick up,
right?

I confess I don't like it very much.

I'd much prefer to be able to use a generic foo_get_parent_irq_domain()
function which just returns an answer or an error.

Definitely none of this "if it returns NULL, caller fills it in for
themselves with some magic global because we're special".

And I don't much like abusing the irq_alloc_info for this either. I
didn't like the irq_alloc_info very much in its *original* use cases,
for actually allocating IRQs. Abusing it for this is worse.

I'm more than happy to start digging into this, but once I do I fear
I'm not going to stop until HPET and IOAPIC don't know *anything* about
whether they're behind IR or not.

And yes, I know that IOAPIC has a different EOI method for IR but
AFAICT that's *already* hosed for Hyper-V because it doesn't *really*
do remapping and so the RTEs *can* change there to move interrupts
around. There's more differences between ioapic_ack_level() and
ioapic_ir_ack_level() than the erratum workaround and whether we use
data->entry.vector... aren't there?

For the specific case you were targeting with this patch, you already
successfully persuaded me it should never happen, and there's a WARN_ON
which would trigger if it ever does (with too many CPUs in the system).

Let's come back and tackle this can of worms in a separate cleanup
series.

[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5174 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-09  7:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-05 15:28 [PATCH 0/13] Fix per-domain IRQ affinity, allow >255 CPUs on x86 without IRQ remapping David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 01/13] x86/apic: Use x2apic in guest kernels even with unusable CPUs David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 02/13] x86/msi: Only use high bits of MSI address for DMAR unit David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 20:45     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 03/13] x86/ioapic: Handle Extended Destination ID field in RTE David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 04/13] x86/apic: Support 15 bits of APIC ID in IOAPIC/MSI where available David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 05/13] genirq: Prepare for default affinity to be passed to __irq_alloc_descs() David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:01     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-06 21:07       ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 06/13] genirq: Add default_affinity argument " David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:06     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 07/13] irqdomain: Add max_affinity argument to irq_domain_alloc_descs() David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:26     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07  7:19       ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 13:37         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 14:10           ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 15:57             ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 16:11               ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 20:53                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-08  7:21               ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-08  9:34                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-08 11:10                   ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-08 12:40                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-09  7:54                       ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 08/13] genirq: Add irq_domain_set_affinity() David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:32     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07  7:22       ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 09/13] x86/irq: Add x86_non_ir_cpumask David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:42     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07  7:25       ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 10/13] x86/irq: Limit IOAPIC and MSI domains' affinity without IR David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:54     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07  7:48       ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 12:59         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 13:08           ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 14:05             ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 14:23               ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 16:02                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 16:15                   ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 15:05               ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 15:25                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 15:46                   ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 17:23                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 17:34                       ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 11/13] x86/smp: Allow more than 255 CPUs even without interrupt remapping David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 12/13] iommu/irq_remapping: Kill most of hyperv-iommu.c now it's redundant David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 13/13] x86/kvm: Add KVM_FEATURE_MSI_EXT_DEST_ID David Woodhouse
2020-10-07  8:14     ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-07  8:59       ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 11:15         ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-07 12:04           ` David Woodhouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2e1aa9c1c2b01c570093fb8d59773d92ece1618a.camel@infradead.org \
    --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).