From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, x86@kernel.org
Cc: iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] x86/irq: Limit IOAPIC and MSI domains' affinity without IR
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 14:59:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874kn65h0r.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d34efce9ca5a4a9d8d8609f872143e306bf5ee98.camel@infradead.org>
On Wed, Oct 07 2020 at 08:48, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-10-06 at 23:54 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 05 2020 at 16:28, David Woodhouse wrote:
> This is the case I called out in the cover letter:
>
> This patch series implements a per-domain "maximum affinity" set and
> uses it for the non-remapped IOAPIC and MSI domains on x86. As well as
> allowing more CPUs to be used without interrupt remapping, this also
> fixes the case where some IOAPICs or PCI devices aren't actually in
> scope of any active IOMMU and are operating without remapping.
>
> To fix *that* case, we really do need the whole series giving us per-
> domain restricted affinity, and to use it for those MSIs/IOAPICs that
> the IRQ remapping doesn't cover.
Which do not exist today.
>> > ip->irqdomain->parent = parent;
>> > + if (parent == x86_vector_domain)
>> > + irq_domain_set_affinity(ip->irqdomain, &x86_non_ir_cpumask);
>>
>> OMG
>
> This IOAPIC function may or may not be behind remapping.
>> > d->flags |= IRQ_DOMAIN_MSI_NOMASK_QUIRK;
>> > + irq_domain_set_affinity(d, &x86_non_ir_cpumask);
>>
>> So here it's unconditional
>
> Yes, this code is only for the non-remapped case and there's a separate
> arch_create_remap_msi_irq_domain() function a few lines further down
> which creates the IR-PCI-MSI IRQ domain. So no need for a condition
> here.
>
>> > + if (parent == x86_vector_domain)
>> > + irq_domain_set_affinity(d, &x86_non_ir_cpumask);
>>
>> And here we need a condition again. Completely obvious and reviewable - NOT.
>
> And HPET may or may not be behind remapping so again needs the
> condition. I had figured that part was fairly obvious but can note it
> in the commit comment.
And all of this is completely wrong to begin with.
The information has to property of the relevant irq domains and the
hierarchy allows you nicely to retrieve it from there instead of
sprinkling this all over the place.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-07 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-05 15:28 [PATCH 0/13] Fix per-domain IRQ affinity, allow >255 CPUs on x86 without IRQ remapping David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 01/13] x86/apic: Use x2apic in guest kernels even with unusable CPUs David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 02/13] x86/msi: Only use high bits of MSI address for DMAR unit David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 20:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 03/13] x86/ioapic: Handle Extended Destination ID field in RTE David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 04/13] x86/apic: Support 15 bits of APIC ID in IOAPIC/MSI where available David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 05/13] genirq: Prepare for default affinity to be passed to __irq_alloc_descs() David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-06 21:07 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 06/13] genirq: Add default_affinity argument " David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 07/13] irqdomain: Add max_affinity argument to irq_domain_alloc_descs() David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 7:19 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 13:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 14:10 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 15:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 16:11 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 20:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-08 7:21 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-08 9:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-08 11:10 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-08 12:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-09 7:54 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 08/13] genirq: Add irq_domain_set_affinity() David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 7:22 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 09/13] x86/irq: Add x86_non_ir_cpumask David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 7:25 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 10/13] x86/irq: Limit IOAPIC and MSI domains' affinity without IR David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 7:48 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 12:59 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-10-07 13:08 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 14:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 14:23 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 16:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 16:15 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 15:05 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 15:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 15:46 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 17:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 17:34 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 11/13] x86/smp: Allow more than 255 CPUs even without interrupt remapping David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 12/13] iommu/irq_remapping: Kill most of hyperv-iommu.c now it's redundant David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 13/13] x86/kvm: Add KVM_FEATURE_MSI_EXT_DEST_ID David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 8:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-07 8:59 ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 11:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-07 12:04 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874kn65h0r.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).