From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83C8C433F5 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 22:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232861AbiDFWNc (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 18:13:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44640 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233642AbiDFWN2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 18:13:28 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E59265C351; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:11:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1649283088; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kjO+FcQEbzxNg96q+CVmF00/Fnf4v+c6IvBo4ypadGM=; b=MDuDrMsLXT/GQRVb1ZTFGX5T1I+FdkjJWTul1ShjgI4pL+Dl8SLAHZGvNn6gjOifz29Aij LtwQGLnBbbAaxhNsSJHXixYSJPAkT5PXM/LIHVVsjwRHIA82U5PyFhHwUhMHpnjg9DkUpK XDWhiJALkz/J82FdRql2L4Tn8dExuRbpLwTkBxOkzOggDC9O/J7n4iyYlkAgRFii0kky9M gRCUhTIW+opQ9cHKacXd0v31t0o4eyOWXV/GnPY9wHGeXfgphZ3nvpglWFHLl+iKOJVNf0 bx7RuROx41KU9bEMsqOpKLZpSHOyBvPMo89txpgbl+CjlIz2XxqPfK1OS2X4oA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1649283088; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kjO+FcQEbzxNg96q+CVmF00/Fnf4v+c6IvBo4ypadGM=; b=/JM3+JRbyPJzN47EjFTCmy7kGOujjw4LAotjVETTRqG+McDzrvIwV7iirZ2G3TRLNTSinL FgoFrheKZGhP44AQ== To: Reto Buerki , dwmw2@infradead.org Cc: x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, joro@8bytes.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, maz@misterjones.org, decui@microsoft.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/msi: Fix msi message data shadow struct In-Reply-To: <20220406083624.38739-2-reet@codelabs.ch> References: <20201024213535.443185-13-dwmw2@infradead.org> <20220406083624.38739-1-reet@codelabs.ch> <20220406083624.38739-2-reet@codelabs.ch> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 00:11:28 +0200 Message-ID: <87pmltzwtr.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org Reto, On Wed, Apr 06 2022 at 10:36, Reto Buerki wrote: > The x86 MSI message data is 32 bits in total and is either in > compatibility or remappable format, see Intel Virtualization Technology > for Directed I/O, section 5.1.2. > > Fixes: 6285aa50736 ("x86/msi: Provide msi message shadow structs") > Signed-off-by: Reto Buerki > Signed-off-by: Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger This signed-off by chain is incorrect. It would be correct if Adrian-Ken would have sent the patch. If you both worked on that then please use the Co-developed-by tag according to Documentation/process/ Thanks, tglx