From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3BC6C2D0A8 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 06:41:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D6A420848 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 06:41:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="3b6vWZ3F"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="4oScqGVN" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725320AbgI3Glv (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 02:41:51 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:54218 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725440AbgI3Glv (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 02:41:51 -0400 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1601448108; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EJKrDPg1zMcLHTJ9psmGJPskafubkx5uuA4rv00RWvE=; b=3b6vWZ3FYwgK0uGd/jHNKkzf932WR9YVcHqnMSL9hHtR4FHsBZC07JwnVnqMJT9Jed2laM sOmj+DtePTxNt1wmjH5DZ6o2s5opDsc8D9ifXyqbFVzXOdAfouLp4tTZLVGyMM1xzNgVNF SiFdV8l6tmYAgTktBPpm/Iadr8yO4O7oHnUbbnOIztDfkFXFDnrym1ArBAMUmD2E46aShM CD+CVsD5I4NZ1O1jmOVTRGe6+5R2FDp5MP/BP/FjqJPOUfRmKvz3lfIp+HuQ1y5Tb6Yo6V QtpSVxjdk4qgFUFhEUdh5DLZfdeQVjrBT9YrrBtUq7PiKVvMzZoW945MxWorVA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1601448108; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EJKrDPg1zMcLHTJ9psmGJPskafubkx5uuA4rv00RWvE=; b=4oScqGVN58GGowfuDE4TlRtr/G0yJIGU+gi/diGlZDZu0wervLchyWESUEEFxWNHdARjHI QIrbJgszY1bnCuAA== To: "Dey\, Megha" , LKML Cc: x86@kernel.org, Joerg Roedel , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, Haiyang Zhang , Jon Derrick , Lu Baolu , Wei Liu , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Stephen Hemminger , Steve Wahl , Dimitri Sivanich , Russ Anderson , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Juergen Gross , Boris Ostrovsky , Stefano Stabellini , Marc Zyngier , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Jason Gunthorpe , Dave Jiang , Alex Williamson , Jacob Pan , Baolu Lu , Kevin Tian , Dan Williams , dave.jiang@intel.com, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com Subject: Re: [patch V2 00/46] x86, PCI, XEN, genirq ...: Prepare for device MSI In-Reply-To: <10b5d933-f104-7699-341a-0afb16640d54@intel.com> References: <20200826111628.794979401@linutronix.de> <10b5d933-f104-7699-341a-0afb16640d54@intel.com> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:41:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87v9fvix5f.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 29 2020 at 16:03, Megha Dey wrote: > On 8/26/2020 4:16 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> #9 is obviously just for the folks interested in IMS >> > > I see that the tip tree (as of 9/29) has most of these patches but > notice that the DEV_MSI related patches > > haven't made it. I have tested the tip tree(x86/irq branch) with your > DEV_MSI infra patches and our IMS patches with the IDXD driver and was Your IMS patches? Why do you need something special again? > wondering if we should push out those patches as part of our patchset? As I don't have any hardware to test that, I was waiting for you and Jason to confirm that this actually works for the two different IMS implementations. Thanks, tglx