From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
To: "Andrea Parri (Microsoft)" <parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH] scsi: storvsc: Fix validation for unsolicited incoming packets
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:33:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BN8PR21MB1284DC9279AC61FE0C267C5ACAA99@BN8PR21MB1284.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN8PR21MB128430486E2F07EA71A7FCBDCAA89@BN8PR21MB1284.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Haiyang Zhang
> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 6:06 PM
> To: Andrea Parri (Microsoft) <parri.andrea@gmail.com>; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> scsi@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>; Stephen Hemminger
> <sthemmin@microsoft.com>; Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>; James E . J .
> Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>; Martin K . Petersen
> <martin.petersen@oracle.com>; Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>;
> Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
> Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH] scsi: storvsc: Fix validation for unsolicited
> incoming packets
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrea Parri (Microsoft) <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 12:38 PM
> > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > scsi@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>; Haiyang Zhang
> > <haiyangz@microsoft.com>; Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>;
> > Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>; James E . J . Bottomley
> > <jejb@linux.ibm.com>; Martin K . Petersen
> > <martin.petersen@oracle.com>; Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>;
> > Andrea Parri (Microsoft) <parri.andrea@gmail.com>; Dexuan Cui
> > <decui@microsoft.com>
> > Subject: [RFC PATCH] scsi: storvsc: Fix validation for unsolicited
> > incoming packets
> >
> > The validation on the length of incoming packets performed in
> > storvsc_on_channel_callback() does not apply to "unsolicited"
> > packets with ID of 0 sent by Hyper-V. Adjust the validation by
> > handling such unsolicited packets separately.
> >
> > Fixes: 91b1b640b834b2 ("scsi: storvsc: Validate length of incoming
> > packet in storvsc_on_channel_callback()")
> > Reported-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri (Microsoft) <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > The (new) bound, VSTOR_MIN_UNSOL_PKT_SIZE, was "empirically derived"
> > based on testing and code auditing. This explains the RFC tag...
> >
> > drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> > index ebbbc1299c625..a9bbcbbfb54ee 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> > @@ -292,6 +292,9 @@ struct vmstorage_protocol_version {
> > #define STORAGE_CHANNEL_REMOVABLE_FLAG 0x1
> > #define STORAGE_CHANNEL_EMULATED_IDE_FLAG 0x2
> >
> > +/* Lower bound on the size of unsolicited packets with ID of 0 */
> > +#define VSTOR_MIN_UNSOL_PKT_SIZE 48
> > +
> > struct vstor_packet {
> > /* Requested operation type */
> > enum vstor_packet_operation operation; @@ -1285,11 +1288,13 @@
> > static void storvsc_on_channel_callback(void
> > *context)
> > foreach_vmbus_pkt(desc, channel) {
> > struct vstor_packet *packet = hv_pkt_data(desc);
> > struct storvsc_cmd_request *request = NULL;
> > + u32 pktlen = hv_pkt_datalen(desc);
> > u64 rqst_id = desc->trans_id;
> >
> > - if (hv_pkt_datalen(desc) < sizeof(struct vstor_packet) -
> > + /* Unsolicited packets with ID of 0 are validated separately
> > below */
> > + if (rqst_id != 0 && pktlen < sizeof(struct vstor_packet) -
> > stor_device->vmscsi_size_delta) {
> > - dev_err(&device->device, "Invalid packet len\n");
> > + dev_err(&device->device, "Invalid packet: length=%u\n",
> > pktlen);
> > continue;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1298,8 +1303,14 @@ static void storvsc_on_channel_callback(void
> > *context)
> > } else if (rqst_id == VMBUS_RQST_RESET) {
> > request = &stor_device->reset_request;
> > } else {
> > - /* Hyper-V can send an unsolicited message with ID of 0
> > */
> > if (rqst_id == 0) {
> > + if (pktlen < VSTOR_MIN_UNSOL_PKT_SIZE) {
> > + dev_err(&device->device,
> > + "Invalid packet with ID of 0:
> > length=%u\n",
> > + pktlen);
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > +
> > /*
> > * storvsc_on_receive() looks at the vstor_packet
> in the message
> > * from the ring buffer. If the operation in the
> vstor_packet is
>
> The patch looks good. But for readability, I'd suggested put the length
> checks together like this:
>
> u32 minlen = rqst_id ? sizeof(struct vstor_packet) -
> stor_device->vmscsi_size_delta : VSTOR_MIN_UNSOL_PKT_SIZE;
>
> if (pktlen < minlen) {
> dev_err(&device->device,
> "Invalid pkt: id=%llu, len=%u, minlen=%u\n",
> rqst_id, pktlen, minlen);
> continue;
> }
>
> Thanks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
The tag was meant to be:
Reviewed-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-29 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-28 16:37 [RFC PATCH] scsi: storvsc: Fix validation for unsolicited incoming packets Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2021-09-28 22:05 ` Haiyang Zhang
2021-09-29 13:33 ` Haiyang Zhang [this message]
2021-09-29 13:55 ` Andrea Parri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BN8PR21MB1284DC9279AC61FE0C267C5ACAA99@BN8PR21MB1284.namprd21.prod.outlook.com \
--to=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).