From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE430C54E8B for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:14:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D064720736 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:14:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729750AbgELNOy (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2020 09:14:54 -0400 Received: from sauhun.de ([88.99.104.3]:57070 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726891AbgELNOy (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2020 09:14:54 -0400 Received: from localhost (p54B332DE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.179.50.222]) by pokefinder.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10E3C2C1F86; Tue, 12 May 2020 15:14:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 15:14:51 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Thierry Reding Cc: Jon Hunter , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] i2c: tegra: Add support for the VI I2C on Tegra210 Message-ID: <20200512131451.GD13516@ninjato> References: <20200506191511.2791107-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mJm6k4Vb/yFcL9ZU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200506191511.2791107-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --mJm6k4Vb/yFcL9ZU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi Thierry, > That said, I could also put this set of patches (except the DTS change) > into the same branch I already have for Dmitry's patches (plus the fixes > that we had discussed) and take it into linux-next and let it brew for a > couple of days to get more testing and then send everything to you with > a PR, say, sometime next week? How does that sound? Well, it is already next week when you get my answer... Yes, sure this is fine with me. Makes dependency handling and testing easier. Kind regards, Wolfram --mJm6k4Vb/yFcL9ZU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAl66oUsACgkQFA3kzBSg KbbfCg//fEdxF0/79wz/eBvSVNZhbTk/yqSp0RuAH1AoLR+xrEl4gpSeZ7WSGiD4 WFUkcBaMu9Tdke08opsPKnc3EGntr9voaewUo8RxcjxS28sQkP0U7nRrw396TGWM 2ZKNNQgWP6wqu+EHqbyZysNvbFnAoQVYQuJP/G8xyJhxt7GbY1PysqIbmWvuHYzr +of0IUhBtB1qtp30GH/2nNw8gR8VEHIuQU6z7GCAhvhgjMFoq2TIfs/7IbEePaLZ nURFT6+XDF2fY9+7NREsvLjTCWxy2mRQK9ph2adSmk10dPcFBatHI/LdH/RWRuFp IYhNyitEz4Zc0AXqI4z3y0bVvh1Jbt0756F0W+7/zxCyEdzHM+RpAefdxqR6RQv6 xsiVeC8jCY6Cal9QkXVN74R9iBRJbbaAXyF20gecZjk6O8l1I4q75xxNoH6C7kSJ KkwpHUNUzl8zezptrL0+SkmKSaqBKTve7/KrEGU01Fnv7is4k8b8b/zbq6/DEXPi ++HNQE22GMJZgd0LbMAPC9LGEO0GkPX9Fqlt3UZTCOUqW3cu+p6Ug3I2rSstRau1 TA/t4Go/dB19BjnDfM9LrFC2ocM/m+vaeo2xwaqJFmnAdQP3YPy1yvIr3x+X+qse PgfzmpON+kIF7GQITuegUta9M2ceTBSyjcOyOT3WTqgOQXtSh70= =e493 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mJm6k4Vb/yFcL9ZU--