[PATCH v15 0/2] add power control in i2c

[PATCH v15 0/2] add power control in i2c

[Bibby Hsieh]

Although in the most platforms, the power of eeprom
and i2c are alway on, some platforms disable the
eeprom and i2c power in order to meet low power request.

This patch add the pm_runtime ops to control power to
support all platforms.

Changes since v14:
 - change the return value in normal condition
 - access the variable after NULL pointer checking
 - add ack tag

Changes since v13:
 - fixup some logic error

Changes since v12:
 - rebase onto v5.7-rc1
 - change the property description in binding

Changes since v11:
 - use suspend_late/resume_early instead of suspend/resume
 - rebase onto v5.6-rc1

Changes since v10:
 - fixup some worng codes

Changes since v9:
 - fixup build error
 - remove redundant code

Changes since v8:
 - fixup some wrong code
 - remove redundant message

        [... snip ...]

Bibby Hsieh (2):
  dt-binding: i2c: add bus-supply property
  i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c.txt |  3 +
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c                   | 84 +++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/i2c.h                           |  2 +
 3 files changed, 89 insertions(+)

-- 
2.18.0

[PATCH v15 1/2] dt-binding: i2c: add bus-supply property

[Bibby Hsieh]

In some platforms, they disable the power-supply of i2c due
to power consumption reduction. This patch add bus-supply property.

Signed-off-by: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c.txt | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c.txt
index 9a53df4243c6..e6b5aafc5dc9 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c.txt
@@ -98,6 +98,9 @@ wants to support one of the below features, it should adapt the bindings below.
 	Names of map programmable addresses.
 	It can contain any map needing another address than default one.
 
+- bus-supply
+	phandle to the regulator that provides power to SCL/SDA.
+
 Binding may contain optional "interrupts" property, describing interrupts
 used by the device. I2C core will assign "irq" interrupt (or the very first
 interrupt if not using interrupt names) as primary interrupt for the slave.
-- 
2.18.0

[PATCH v15 2/2] i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter

[Bibby Hsieh]

Although in the most platforms, the bus power of i2c
are alway on, some platforms disable the i2c bus power
in order to meet low power request.

We get and enable bulk regulator in i2c adapter device.

Signed-off-by: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/i2c.h         |  2 +
 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
index 5cc0b0ec5570..e1cc8d46bc51 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
@@ -313,12 +313,14 @@ static int i2c_smbus_host_notify_to_irq(const struct i2c_client *client)
 static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct i2c_client	*client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
+	struct i2c_adapter	*adap;
 	struct i2c_driver	*driver;
 	int status;
 
 	if (!client)
 		return 0;
 
+	adap = client->adapter;
 	driver = to_i2c_driver(dev->driver);
 
 	client->irq = client->init_irq;
@@ -378,6 +380,12 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
 
 	dev_dbg(dev, "probe\n");
 
+	status = regulator_enable(adap->bus_regulator);
+	if (status < 0) {
+		dev_err(&adap->dev, "Failed to enable power regulator\n");
+		goto err_clear_wakeup_irq;
+	}
+
 	status = of_clk_set_defaults(dev->of_node, false);
 	if (status < 0)
 		goto err_clear_wakeup_irq;
@@ -414,12 +422,14 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
 static int i2c_device_remove(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct i2c_client	*client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
+	struct i2c_adapter      *adap;
 	struct i2c_driver	*driver;
 	int status = 0;
 
 	if (!client || !dev->driver)
 		return 0;
 
+	adap = client->adapter;
 	driver = to_i2c_driver(dev->driver);
 	if (driver->remove) {
 		dev_dbg(dev, "remove\n");
@@ -427,6 +437,8 @@ static int i2c_device_remove(struct device *dev)
 	}
 
 	dev_pm_domain_detach(&client->dev, true);
+	if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&client->dev))
+		regulator_disable(adap->bus_regulator);
 
 	dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(&client->dev);
 	device_init_wakeup(&client->dev, false);
@@ -438,6 +450,72 @@ static int i2c_device_remove(struct device *dev)
 	return status;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int i2c_resume_early(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct i2c_client *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
+	struct i2c_adapter *adap = client->adapter;
+	int err;
+
+	if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&client->dev)) {
+		err = regulator_enable(adap->bus_regulator);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+	}
+
+	return pm_generic_resume_early(&client->dev);
+}
+
+static int i2c_suspend_late(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct i2c_client *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
+	struct i2c_adapter *adap = client->adapter;
+	int err;
+
+	err = pm_generic_suspend_late(&client->dev);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&client->dev))
+		return regulator_disable(adap->bus_regulator);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+static int i2c_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct i2c_client *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
+	struct i2c_adapter *adap = client->adapter;
+	int err;
+
+	err = regulator_enable(adap->bus_regulator);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	return pm_generic_runtime_resume(&client->dev);
+}
+
+static int i2c_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct i2c_client *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
+	struct i2c_adapter *adap = client->adapter;
+	int err;
+
+	err = pm_generic_runtime_suspend(&client->dev);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	return regulator_disable(adap->bus_regulator);
+}
+#endif
+
+static const struct dev_pm_ops i2c_device_pm = {
+	SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(i2c_suspend_late, i2c_resume_early)
+	SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(i2c_runtime_suspend, i2c_runtime_resume, NULL)
+};
+
 static void i2c_device_shutdown(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct i2c_client *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
@@ -495,6 +573,7 @@ struct bus_type i2c_bus_type = {
 	.probe		= i2c_device_probe,
 	.remove		= i2c_device_remove,
 	.shutdown	= i2c_device_shutdown,
+	.pm		= &i2c_device_pm,
 };
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_bus_type);
 
@@ -1333,6 +1412,11 @@ static int i2c_register_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
 	if (res)
 		goto out_reg;
 
+	adap->bus_regulator = devm_regulator_get(&adap->dev, "bus");
+	if (IS_ERR(adap->bus_regulator)) {
+		res = PTR_ERR(adap->bus_regulator);
+		goto out_reg;
+	}
 	dev_dbg(&adap->dev, "adapter [%s] registered\n", adap->name);
 
 	pm_runtime_no_callbacks(&adap->dev);
diff --git a/include/linux/i2c.h b/include/linux/i2c.h
index 456fc17ecb1c..bc83af0d38d1 100644
--- a/include/linux/i2c.h
+++ b/include/linux/i2c.h
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include <linux/device.h>	/* for struct device */
 #include <linux/sched.h>	/* for completion */
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
 #include <linux/rtmutex.h>
 #include <linux/irqdomain.h>		/* for Host Notify IRQ */
 #include <linux/of.h>		/* for struct device_node */
@@ -721,6 +722,7 @@ struct i2c_adapter {
 	const struct i2c_adapter_quirks *quirks;
 
 	struct irq_domain *host_notify_domain;
+	struct regulator *bus_regulator;
 };
 #define to_i2c_adapter(d) container_of(d, struct i2c_adapter, dev)
 
-- 
2.18.0

Re: [PATCH v15 1/2] dt-binding: i2c: add bus-supply property

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 334 bytes --]

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 03:27:28PM +0800, Bibby Hsieh wrote:
> In some platforms, they disable the power-supply of i2c due
> to power consumption reduction. This patch add bus-supply property.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Applied to for-next, thanks!


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v15 2/2] i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 405 bytes --]

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 03:27:29PM +0800, Bibby Hsieh wrote:
> Although in the most platforms, the bus power of i2c
> are alway on, some platforms disable the i2c bus power
> in order to meet low power request.
> 
> We get and enable bulk regulator in i2c adapter device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>

Applied to for-next, thanks! I added Tomasz Rev-by: for you.


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v15 1/2] dt-binding: i2c: add bus-supply property

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 470 bytes --]

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:48:00AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 03:27:28PM +0800, Bibby Hsieh wrote:
> > In some platforms, they disable the power-supply of i2c due
> > to power consumption reduction. This patch add bus-supply property.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> 
> Applied to for-next, thanks!

Reverted because of regression reports in linux-next.


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v15 2/2] i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 642 bytes --]

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:48:33AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 03:27:29PM +0800, Bibby Hsieh wrote:
> > Although in the most platforms, the bus power of i2c
> > are alway on, some platforms disable the i2c bus power
> > in order to meet low power request.
> > 
> > We get and enable bulk regulator in i2c adapter device.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>
> 
> Applied to for-next, thanks! I added Tomasz Rev-by: for you.

Reverted because of regression reports in linux-next. I am all open for
the change in general, but it looks to me that we should wait another
cycle.


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v15 2/2] i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter

[Grygorii Strashko]

On 19/05/2020 10:27, Bibby Hsieh wrote:
> Although in the most platforms, the bus power of i2c
> are alway on, some platforms disable the i2c bus power
> in order to meet low power request.
> 
> We get and enable bulk regulator in i2c adapter device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>
> ---
>   drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   include/linux/i2c.h         |  2 +
>   2 files changed, 86 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> index 5cc0b0ec5570..e1cc8d46bc51 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> @@ -313,12 +313,14 @@ static int i2c_smbus_host_notify_to_irq(const struct i2c_client *client)
>   static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
>   {
>   	struct i2c_client	*client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
> +	struct i2c_adapter	*adap;
>   	struct i2c_driver	*driver;
>   	int status;
>   
>   	if (!client)
>   		return 0;
>   
> +	adap = client->adapter;
>   	driver = to_i2c_driver(dev->driver);
>   
>   	client->irq = client->init_irq;
> @@ -378,6 +380,12 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
>   
>   	dev_dbg(dev, "probe\n");
>   
> +	status = regulator_enable(adap->bus_regulator);
> +	if (status < 0) {
> +		dev_err(&adap->dev, "Failed to enable power regulator\n");
> +		goto err_clear_wakeup_irq;
> +	}
> +
>   	status = of_clk_set_defaults(dev->of_node, false);
>   	if (status < 0)
>   		goto err_clear_wakeup_irq;
> @@ -414,12 +422,14 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
>   static int i2c_device_remove(struct device *dev)
>   {
>   	struct i2c_client	*client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
> +	struct i2c_adapter      *adap;
>   	struct i2c_driver	*driver;
>   	int status = 0;
>   
>   	if (!client || !dev->driver)
>   		return 0;
>   
> +	adap = client->adapter;
>   	driver = to_i2c_driver(dev->driver);
>   	if (driver->remove) {
>   		dev_dbg(dev, "remove\n");
> @@ -427,6 +437,8 @@ static int i2c_device_remove(struct device *dev)
>   	}
>   
>   	dev_pm_domain_detach(&client->dev, true);
> +	if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&client->dev))
> +		regulator_disable(adap->bus_regulator);

Not sure this check is correct.

i2c_device_probe()
  - regulator_enable - 1

pm_runtime_get()
  - regulator_enable - 2

i2c_device_remove()
  - pm_runtime_status_suspended() flase
    - regulator_disable() - 1 --> still active?

Sorry, I probably missing smth.

>   
>   	dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(&client->dev);
>   	device_init_wakeup(&client->dev, false);
> @@ -438,6 +450,72 @@ static int i2c_device_remove(struct device *dev)
>   	return status;
>   }
>   

[...]

-- 
Best regards,
grygorii

Re: [PATCH v15 2/2] i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter

[Tomasz Figa]

Hi Grygorii,

On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 7:59 PM Grygorii Strashko
<grygorii.strashko@ti.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 19/05/2020 10:27, Bibby Hsieh wrote:
> > Although in the most platforms, the bus power of i2c
> > are alway on, some platforms disable the i2c bus power
> > in order to meet low power request.
> >
> > We get and enable bulk regulator in i2c adapter device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   include/linux/i2c.h         |  2 +
> >   2 files changed, 86 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> > index 5cc0b0ec5570..e1cc8d46bc51 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> > @@ -313,12 +313,14 @@ static int i2c_smbus_host_notify_to_irq(const struct i2c_client *client)
> >   static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
> >   {
> >       struct i2c_client       *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
> > +     struct i2c_adapter      *adap;
> >       struct i2c_driver       *driver;
> >       int status;
> >
> >       if (!client)
> >               return 0;
> >
> > +     adap = client->adapter;
> >       driver = to_i2c_driver(dev->driver);
> >
> >       client->irq = client->init_irq;
> > @@ -378,6 +380,12 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
> >
> >       dev_dbg(dev, "probe\n");
> >
> > +     status = regulator_enable(adap->bus_regulator);
> > +     if (status < 0) {
> > +             dev_err(&adap->dev, "Failed to enable power regulator\n");
> > +             goto err_clear_wakeup_irq;
> > +     }
> > +
> >       status = of_clk_set_defaults(dev->of_node, false);
> >       if (status < 0)
> >               goto err_clear_wakeup_irq;
> > @@ -414,12 +422,14 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
> >   static int i2c_device_remove(struct device *dev)
> >   {
> >       struct i2c_client       *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
> > +     struct i2c_adapter      *adap;
> >       struct i2c_driver       *driver;
> >       int status = 0;
> >
> >       if (!client || !dev->driver)
> >               return 0;
> >
> > +     adap = client->adapter;
> >       driver = to_i2c_driver(dev->driver);
> >       if (driver->remove) {
> >               dev_dbg(dev, "remove\n");
> > @@ -427,6 +437,8 @@ static int i2c_device_remove(struct device *dev)
> >       }
> >
> >       dev_pm_domain_detach(&client->dev, true);
> > +     if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&client->dev))
> > +             regulator_disable(adap->bus_regulator);
>
> Not sure this check is correct.
>
> i2c_device_probe()
>   - regulator_enable - 1
>
> pm_runtime_get()
>   - regulator_enable - 2
>

I believe regulator_enable() wouldn't be called again, because the
device was already active in probe. However, I've been having
difficulties keeping track of runtime PM semantics under various
circumstances (e.g. ACPI vs DT), so can't tell for sure anymore.

> i2c_device_remove()
>   - pm_runtime_status_suspended() flase
>     - regulator_disable() - 1 --> still active?
>
> Sorry, I probably missing smth.
>
> >
> >       dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(&client->dev);
> >       device_init_wakeup(&client->dev, false);
> > @@ -438,6 +450,72 @@ static int i2c_device_remove(struct device *dev)
> >       return status;
> >   }
> >
>
> [...]
>
> --
> Best regards,
> grygorii

Re: [PATCH v15 2/2] i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter

[Tomasz Figa]

On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 5:00 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:48:33AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 03:27:29PM +0800, Bibby Hsieh wrote:
> > > Although in the most platforms, the bus power of i2c
> > > are alway on, some platforms disable the i2c bus power
> > > in order to meet low power request.
> > >
> > > We get and enable bulk regulator in i2c adapter device.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>
> >
> > Applied to for-next, thanks! I added Tomasz Rev-by: for you.
>
> Reverted because of regression reports in linux-next. I am all open for
> the change in general, but it looks to me that we should wait another
> cycle.
>

Thanks Wolfram and sorry for the trouble.

Bibby, I think we need a bit more thorough testing. We can discuss the
details offline.

Best regards,
Tomasz

Re: [PATCH v15 2/2] i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 270 bytes --]


> > Reverted because of regression reports in linux-next. I am all open for
> > the change in general, but it looks to me that we should wait another
> > cycle.
> >
> 
> Thanks Wolfram and sorry for the trouble.

No worries. Glad you guys are working on it.


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v15 2/2] i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter

[Grygorii Strashko]

On 25/05/2020 14:34, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Grygorii,
> 
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 7:59 PM Grygorii Strashko
> <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 19/05/2020 10:27, Bibby Hsieh wrote:
>>> Although in the most platforms, the bus power of i2c
>>> are alway on, some platforms disable the i2c bus power
>>> in order to meet low power request.
>>>
>>> We get and enable bulk regulator in i2c adapter device.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    include/linux/i2c.h         |  2 +
>>>    2 files changed, 86 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
>>> index 5cc0b0ec5570..e1cc8d46bc51 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
>>> @@ -313,12 +313,14 @@ static int i2c_smbus_host_notify_to_irq(const struct i2c_client *client)
>>>    static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
>>>    {
>>>        struct i2c_client       *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
>>> +     struct i2c_adapter      *adap;
>>>        struct i2c_driver       *driver;
>>>        int status;
>>>
>>>        if (!client)
>>>                return 0;
>>>
>>> +     adap = client->adapter;
>>>        driver = to_i2c_driver(dev->driver);
>>>
>>>        client->irq = client->init_irq;
>>> @@ -378,6 +380,12 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
>>>
>>>        dev_dbg(dev, "probe\n");
>>>
>>> +     status = regulator_enable(adap->bus_regulator);
>>> +     if (status < 0) {
>>> +             dev_err(&adap->dev, "Failed to enable power regulator\n");
>>> +             goto err_clear_wakeup_irq;
>>> +     }
>>> +
>>>        status = of_clk_set_defaults(dev->of_node, false);
>>>        if (status < 0)
>>>                goto err_clear_wakeup_irq;
>>> @@ -414,12 +422,14 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
>>>    static int i2c_device_remove(struct device *dev)
>>>    {
>>>        struct i2c_client       *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
>>> +     struct i2c_adapter      *adap;
>>>        struct i2c_driver       *driver;
>>>        int status = 0;
>>>
>>>        if (!client || !dev->driver)
>>>                return 0;
>>>
>>> +     adap = client->adapter;
>>>        driver = to_i2c_driver(dev->driver);
>>>        if (driver->remove) {
>>>                dev_dbg(dev, "remove\n");
>>> @@ -427,6 +437,8 @@ static int i2c_device_remove(struct device *dev)
>>>        }
>>>
>>>        dev_pm_domain_detach(&client->dev, true);
>>> +     if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&client->dev))
>>> +             regulator_disable(adap->bus_regulator);
>>
>> Not sure this check is correct.
>>
>> i2c_device_probe()
>>    - regulator_enable - 1
>>
>> pm_runtime_get()
>>    - regulator_enable - 2
>>
> 
> I believe regulator_enable() wouldn't be called again, because the
> device was already active in probe. However, I've been having
> difficulties keeping track of runtime PM semantics under various
> circumstances (e.g. ACPI vs DT), so can't tell for sure anymore.

True.

I've found pretty useful:
  - CONFIG_PM_ADVANCED_DEBUG
  - bind/unbind
for such testing.

for regulators - num_users\x02 can be checked.


> 
>> i2c_device_remove()
>>    - pm_runtime_status_suspended() flase
>>      - regulator_disable() - 1 --> still active?
>>
>> Sorry, I probably missing smth.
>>
>>>
>>>        dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(&client->dev);
>>>        device_init_wakeup(&client->dev, false);
>>> @@ -438,6 +450,72 @@ static int i2c_device_remove(struct device *dev)
>>>        return status;
>>>    }
>>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> grygorii

-- 
Best regards,
grygorii