linux-i2c.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
To: daniel.stodden@gmail.com
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, jdelvare@suse.de,
	Daniel Stodden <dns@arista.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] i2c: Support Smbus 3.0 block sizes up to 255 bytes.
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:40:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200728094037.GA980@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200728004708.4430-1-daniel.stodden@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1207 bytes --]

Hi Daniel,

wow, that was fast! Thanks for the prototype.

>  * I suggest to just settle on '3' for new macro and type names
>    (I2C_SMBUS3_*, i2c_smbus3_*)

Yes, I agree.

> 
>  * Block size definitions maintain I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX (32). Only adds
>    I2C_SMBUS3_BLOCK_MAX (255)
> 
>    - Means that drivers in drivers/i2c/busses/ default to their safe
>      32B block limit without refactoring.

This is totally fine for this patch. However, I still think I will do
the renaming to I2C_SMBUS2_BLOCK_MAX in kernel space later. Just so
people will understand by looking at the code that this is an old limit
which can be removed if there is interest.

> -	__u8 block[I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX + 2]; /* block[0] is used for length */
> +	__u8 block[I2C_SMBUS3_BLOCK_MAX + 2]; /* block[0] is used for length */
>  			       /* and one more for user-space compatibility */

I thought about this, too, and wondered if this isn't a size regression
in userspace with every i2c_smbus_data getting 8 times the size? But
maybe it is worth if backwards compatibility is maintained in an
otherwise not so intrusive manner? Jean, what do you think?

Happy hacking everyone,

   Wolfram


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-28  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-28  0:47 [RFC PATCH] i2c: Support Smbus 3.0 block sizes up to 255 bytes daniel.stodden
2020-07-28  9:40 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2020-07-28 10:18   ` Daniel Stodden
2020-07-28 10:36     ` Wolfram Sang
2020-07-28 11:27       ` Daniel Stodden
2020-07-28 17:04   ` Jean Delvare
2020-07-28 21:16     ` Daniel Stodden
2020-07-29 10:51       ` Wolfram Sang
2020-07-28 11:16 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-07-28 11:40   ` Daniel Stodden
2020-07-28 12:46     ` Daniel Stodden

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200728094037.GA980@ninjato \
    --to=wsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.stodden@gmail.com \
    --cc=dns@arista.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).