From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD573C4727C for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 21:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7273920774 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 21:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="VOh/uSh6" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728999AbgI2VAo (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 17:00:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41130 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728729AbgI2VAo (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 17:00:44 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x544.google.com (mail-ed1-x544.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::544]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67A21C061755; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 14:00:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x544.google.com with SMTP id j2so8108428eds.9; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 14:00:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=KFjBMwnr0euHuLOqoi5dKD5UMAj+YeZolmwPYrZ8vCI=; b=VOh/uSh6VZfA3xkq4m0en5VoZi2PBQpqWq/pvwk4OWd58/qLL7UiXMYajKcmtpvt6o EPJRk2YOnr9njp+jkdOWzUqgxbOLwAWgvRG19RjHvZ/FPHW/zXAvWH0YonUDiR1egwUX voGo3LSvRZEvwDBfB6NPn/21GUaikA2kncOIbfOFKXRd5VxyTRnSIhsgNhwPBurFEYYM jD4WOPpNr5+gkxEMcHnaiPqPEsknw0GioeAoOS6fNzS38BwcWUif877Ml+mPfx3YZXZh i20DuJaPTvOth3Xr9Yx0T0K0wul/HiXAxwvqzxuL3OO6gTAhwIweVp9MxHyWGvKDimE0 +EQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=KFjBMwnr0euHuLOqoi5dKD5UMAj+YeZolmwPYrZ8vCI=; b=lCiEPfVb9nCOvsrdbBToXKFiQDEyucTLy3v3B6BTuoAyV+MbWq9BeaOFxQmrrypaBm cw591SwjtsXS5wr78WtaEnu5qc/VcXe0Gn+tOTiyEgV6n8S84t7XLc4RMZb4kLJ1ib3j oCY/JwN2DKoJzE6534rlGWnrSqjCXP7at54YGyD8InY1b5MhmZTE/wd28kBANS+7LXJt f8H//klyKxh7tn/Q9JAoHnXLEcAc7pddnUZqTsg//mNyWZpZuC8hqb6mZdXK0CvZaGR8 gMQTOE5Fe6MISWIYHo9FF23T+0oN7j54g4NojVeBHoqgNTvwfRXl6nd1dU8hN4WIzN4L nzqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530vtbiigR4kw6E88PUHB9lCZcYxMg9ij6M5izBMP4POpUW4yzHS qmoM23i7rQ0cRwdVu7Dt1Qo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzENPgyaRQm3+MFtflMD9edfYqyb/lgtEcQtJ51bMN+IkAWc1fzyob2mUkz6P+pS2srZ/uIow== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:db82:: with SMTP id u2mr4548592edt.262.1601413243079; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 14:00:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BV030612LT (oi48z9.static.otenet.gr. [79.129.51.141]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a2sm16539ejx.27.2020.09.29.14.00.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 14:00:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:00:10 +0300 From: Cristian Ciocaltea To: Wolfram Sang , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-actions@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] i2c: busses: Add support for atomic transfers in Actions Semi Owl driver Message-ID: <20200929210010.GB35053@BV030612LT> References: <20200909151748.GA11397@mani> <20200909165915.GA387239@BV030612LT> <20200910030225.GA10495@mani> <20200910141223.GA447296@BV030612LT> <20200929194523.GE2010@kunai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200929194523.GE2010@kunai> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hi Wolfram, On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:45:23PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > Sure, I can handle this. I assume this should be a separate patch, to > > be applied before the current patch. Should I submit a patch series > > instead? > > Yes, just do it. Sure, I have already clarified this directly with Mani and I'm going to handle it soon. > And please remove irrelevant parts of the mail when > replying. Thanks! Ok, I'll pay attention to this. Thanks, Cristi