On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 09:03:54PM -0700, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote: > VI I2C don't have DMA support and uses PIO mode all the time. > > Current driver uses writesl() to fill TX FIFO based on available > empty slots and with this seeing strange silent hang during any I2C > register access after filling TX FIFO with 8 words. > > Using writel() followed by i2c_readl() in a loop to write all words > to TX FIFO instead of using writesl() helps for large transfers in > PIO mode. > > So, this patch updates i2c_writesl() API to use writel() in a loop > instead of writesl(). > > Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 9 ++++++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c > index 6f08c0c..274bf3a 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c > @@ -333,10 +333,13 @@ static u32 i2c_readl(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, unsigned int reg) > return readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base + tegra_i2c_reg_addr(i2c_dev, reg)); > } > > -static void i2c_writesl(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, void *data, > +static void i2c_writesl(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, u32 *data, > unsigned int reg, unsigned int len) > { > - writesl(i2c_dev->base + tegra_i2c_reg_addr(i2c_dev, reg), data, len); > + while (len--) { > + writel(*data++, i2c_dev->base + tegra_i2c_reg_addr(i2c_dev, reg)); > + i2c_readl(i2c_dev, I2C_INT_STATUS); > + } > } > > static void i2c_readsl(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, void *data, > @@ -811,7 +814,7 @@ static int tegra_i2c_fill_tx_fifo(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev) > i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining = buf_remaining; > i2c_dev->msg_buf = buf + words_to_transfer * BYTES_PER_FIFO_WORD; > > - i2c_writesl(i2c_dev, buf, I2C_TX_FIFO, words_to_transfer); > + i2c_writesl(i2c_dev, (u32 *)buf, I2C_TX_FIFO, words_to_transfer); I've thought a bit more about this and I wonder if we're simply reading out the wrong value for tx_fifo_avail and therefore end up overflowing the TX FIFO. Have you checked what the value is for tx_fifo_avail when this silent hang occurs? Given that this is specific to the VI I2C I'm wondering if this is perhaps a hardware bug where we read the wrong TX FIFO available count. Thierry