From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D093C388F9 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:15:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5AE221D42 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:15:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="aWCS2E3n" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730837AbgJZVPh (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:15:37 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f68.google.com ([209.85.210.68]:43630 "EHLO mail-ot1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730835AbgJZVPh (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:15:37 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f68.google.com with SMTP id k68so9301230otk.10 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:15:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=QmP6ommws7bD3EAxo4Z+a9iuwOjm8jdlxsVzMzZCnic=; b=aWCS2E3njOFgdsl/wWxPpPWRpRb5H1rNzxEFSFzSv2a+GV2SnUCj6GwNg+blzfsZSa HJFytxFRP/GY499T8woCGxYuyOrgkn6j2T416CubUbuedrpIIPODJWr4s9HLjAHmGSGc vd1H5SYbmSE4EARubMoFanLdd4XkUd1ugHXM+t5gADEOy2aCN9f5VBjUoRR1qO7mtwBA 8EpjDWTDwacyPYBlWtUY7FPWVPF7NhJD/IlQsWf3I9Z4eqnVdrF5AMfKId6Fupd2PCW9 CEqZqnCBSIKu1/CsS8PkPuiIfBl4FCjHvLId/uYYLvgBT3mtsrLd6IS1JcACurj0EJC/ SVug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=QmP6ommws7bD3EAxo4Z+a9iuwOjm8jdlxsVzMzZCnic=; b=qZzW10ZNdKQRidz+sW3FgCt5mN3Hg6DKAuAC2GgU1FDpl5WPc26SwiaUUP25Gsy+oT 7vx0zb0p9MdH1Wh9yLI6J1j1vx2r9xyl65c1wBAO7jhI0mPepS91VY26rKiYxF8O9p76 /U3fKYGkQatacahRP9Y6XFF41fqDEP2FvnecWpZzxZ4dw11eRXaznqQUOsz6bxNozFEr gjgwaJGyPWZpDJwIv/7kB7Da15pXXd7RFI4zpHT7HoKX5SnkRWHnWW7rEocfTwKQEs9G JCbXbHT6PYLl+o4pxCA/mD8SWQsFhqO8UUMgOKtwv7OCqgJNvR7HE56iuHCUWngk+mHB Pe3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532VMzni2mEtAhylYYwPSSDeaeMqYkRpER2WerFth2FHjVJ6lwD1 tIPwRZ8KNe6NWGQeLih2yLFKHw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxgiXgtfOSSV05hV3Pfthk/o2qjlzK5rY0LNOqdG7wkBEOkQ1XK4wC4KwhzERrZZVGowdl2AQ== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:75d6:: with SMTP id c22mr12402461otl.213.1603746936482; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:15:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from builder.lan (104-57-184-186.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net. [104.57.184.186]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h15sm4378000ots.31.2020.10.26.14.15.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:15:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:15:34 -0500 From: Bjorn Andersson To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Douglas Anderson , Akash Asthana , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Roja Rani Yarubandi , Stephen Boyd , Dmitry Baryshkov , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Andy Gross , Mukesh Savaliya , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] Revert "i2c: i2c-qcom-geni: Fix DMA transfer race" Message-ID: <20201026211534.GA4001@builder.lan> References: <20201013212531.428538-1-dianders@chromium.org> <20201013142448.v2.2.I7b22281453b8a18ab16ef2bfd4c641fb1cc6a92c@changeid> <20201026150500.GA26921@builder.lan> <20201026151351.GB1044@ninjato> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201026151351.GB1044@ninjato> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Mon 26 Oct 10:13 CDT 2020, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > Wolfram, would you like to pick this patch or would you prefer that it > > goes together with the other two through the soc tree? > > Actually, I prefer the soc tree because of the functional dependency. I > am not aware of any pending qcom-geni patches, yet I think an immutable > branch for me to pull in would be nice in this case. Could you provide > one for me? > Sounds good, please find the series applied on top of v5.10-rc1 at: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/qcom/linux.git tags/20201013212531.428538-1-dianders@chromium.org I've merged the same into the qcom tree for 5.11. Regards, Bjorn