From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A58FC433E0 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:34:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E620864DDB for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229667AbhA1Leh (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 06:34:37 -0500 Received: from www.zeus03.de ([194.117.254.33]:37386 "EHLO mail.zeus03.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229732AbhA1Lef (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 06:34:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=sang-engineering.com; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=4nkTSdX8buaWv7lbqgJ40NcnkFhn gDq+Zq/RII6X8Kk=; b=FTjz0NmVSV5diIDhFRu6lYsbxtj+ynwAUZfE+PFdRafl RNQn90ClIjslDmhHNMFVvgDgyDyrVGAKJXtGNaH+liacXkLFPy6YEK+gP1sNVFR5 5XTQ4hTmfC130A2O4gheF6bH6ko3LyKw9zi/G//wk/GaBohK2qioX7iOziHU6MU= Received: (qmail 213322 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2021 12:33:54 +0100 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 28 Jan 2021 12:33:54 +0100 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@k1cuQ/S5YJcgAwDPXyX1AEdA8SGgn5QT Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:33:53 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , Rob Herring , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: eeprom: at24: Document ROHM BR24G01 Message-ID: <20210128113353.GN963@ninjato> References: <20210128111343.2295888-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="K4LMwn8CgX2KMboP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210128111343.2295888-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --K4LMwn8CgX2KMboP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:13:43PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Document the compatible value for the ROHM Semiconductor BR24G01 I2C bus > EEPROM. What is the difference between those two? Could one also be the fallback of the other (just in the highly unlikely case we need "generic" Rohm handling somewhen)? --K4LMwn8CgX2KMboP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmASoR0ACgkQFA3kzBSg KbZBcg/+IXP5We7pj3OSpMQOfmL8u7yoScPVq83buQF05zrO+dcnr/Pz2kc9zeLQ Z/2sjMYnP5qVFMXh3PP2RUolFh394o6z762Ny6JKSRnTMy/0eEtiUzHEhdJNz8wt WJKz3WYrrxneM3wDMB/m9w98K6EkWJQHVBvGddkX896Z1aoDG3hBBSELszSR4+ot 4F2P6LSZSWEFnkTXGJBdC9msU0yW2UqvIHyWmsFTbcFz8XbpHiF0jKW/yuB3Y3Fs sQ/QiCv+BbNkuMyvHBz/3ddp1KVI7lH0wto67gdfEBHapUN9vjWXb2VONQBG+fzZ VBDObtW9eajJ0pF1KT0RIDtorZq46p7VqmROVSFHd94oJKEsZRfCwiTM2pxvCzol j+IPtOVimz7PkMfplANsHRUzWdpFY/BjeRuLVav9otgaEVrqioY/fHgBhUgfrnos U1B3hPdwJPeBs2gosSGBva9di6P3IRtGPVGGtDVxuRTyfLh/zvNMJxoDyOj+GSst zZRLbYrJTMD5LcXhQ0nmYkj30AKQUvqS2ubrAEAIq+JpvAwcBLxQp9+fpAB8H79q y1yjLUYyJ53m+98Ua6cU/QwuYqcZKpOu6ZVxVc1oYkjHidvUw2WLGoh3b3ZrMefb 5+uBQbXclaX7U/4ZDneLn3Hi1BpwH2M8YcjmdQjXpALXI6LRNjw= =kZc2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --K4LMwn8CgX2KMboP--