From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8878AC433B4 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6ED613C4 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230500AbhDNIbs (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Apr 2021 04:31:48 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:47232 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230373AbhDNIbs (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Apr 2021 04:31:48 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76E47613C0; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:31:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1618389087; bh=oP4zzryECD7J5pXO9mtg7ISNTzP4sd+9qxOtZGNrTV4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Z9+kalaPKeJSXeTxGEENllh21coepFwzcMEbSgE+piv4YMxZVP09y5XQvJkqPN4+B 5xmobS0RTmYKtfMgtRqeaVKHkt68dvvXWkt5M/SxFAgrsuvHYTKi2A9QYyFOAX2mFg GY990c7SV461K8BtgZUxYzomuRk3RhLhSPLHhQA3BJY0Gz22G2K0Vq2QHpoH39yVo0 f3S/CFT360yHzJlVAPTvqdpfY5mPOYKdgtoxaOm4HsJ2uSPnbBSYrcIiHmC1Qw7FvQ tOydQSN7s+pzmRRZBJONo8pr+xaSa5AKl8+uNdXZ00eS5iBmRs24BgkC5ZbFBOXzlr 3/R3HyXeir3bg== Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:31:24 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: "tiantao (H)" Cc: Tian Tao , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH drivers/i2c 1/3] i2c: amd8111: Fix coding style issues Message-ID: <20210414083124.GL2180@ninjato> References: <1617613430-11921-1-git-send-email-tiantao6@hisilicon.com> <1617613430-11921-2-git-send-email-tiantao6@hisilicon.com> <20210413202503.GD2751@kunai> <4aeba72c-46bd-35be-a1e8-2739f1825d92@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SqfawxHnX56H7Ukl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4aeba72c-46bd-35be-a1e8-2739f1825d92@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --SqfawxHnX56H7Ukl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Is the binary after the patch applied equal to the binary before your > > patch? Same question for patch 2. >=20 > The MD5 value of binary is the same before and after the patch is > merged=EF=BC=8Cthe log is as below=EF=BC=9A Thanks for checking! What about patch 2? --SqfawxHnX56H7Ukl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmB2qFwACgkQFA3kzBSg KbYOqxAAmPNdd+lglasSeBK7hoSlOu2uxXZxnbW3ePGtnd2Evurv7tGtPiO/Fa/Z 0f1Lbe0/fxT4f83TuLxBZD4oS45lMReeNiAgipbwzb0Zrpjg+Uvvva8AoDRqtonp VFDl1fQZHVf1fOVRP53Auoz7uXkTh2pVf0ex6owSIlpJrAy2E1bA+giV2/9CdYUH lWbWSBSXzo7JNN+3bK0JGhTSAwi9TkOHL6mR9OINAbzdqu2HFRjfRYmkcgFo1oXv jjc87qLb4GMWHsLi+y9QUln5zDvNmJIEVXmbILYJP0qXR9eS1KB1CZGtDPM9afdX PiWFDEonUsVmot7iUXoSxZucTI71MnLW+Kvg0b90r4aBNtIBLKye2twgSCvB2mOP QTtl0hmpIVJsRUykF00Az9pMlvTi1k6INotVuxmn9toA6KQlAxg5aiBRLR1sR3dM DIPmg3bT6FRuIMsitljO2zcNSkCsCeMDQWsmncklqRrMuxBeCNXQl21P1VvWeM2j Juy3Y2Ae090vX3aWWcv0iyJnYF2QHimEd46P7kx7x3ule/QXPGagQ/Qar1RcxDvC 83urO7lsKGWZ685JTyDkHB6Lua60eXhlu/16TFmAK77pZ+b7x1CKyJJKU2DKhPJf L+KvPe3OuI39nPzUFV1Za5HiCQaH1rNhzrh+w007V45+APBTeu8= =RAeJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SqfawxHnX56H7Ukl--