From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A43C433ED for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 11:22:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 501C560E09 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 11:22:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232966AbhEULXY (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2021 07:23:24 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:33452 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231127AbhEULXX (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2021 07:23:23 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CBC9AC11; Fri, 21 May 2021 11:21:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 13:21:58 +0200 From: Jean Delvare To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Peter Korsgaard , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH i2c-tools] Revert "tools: i2ctransfer: add check for returned length from driver" Message-ID: <20210521132158.6e0689c0@endymion> In-Reply-To: <20210413125433.GA9879@kunai> References: <20210209110556.18814-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20210226174337.63a9c2a6@endymion> <20210310204648.GA332643@ninjato> <87tuoe5zfc.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <20210413125433.GA9879@kunai> Organization: SUSE Linux X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hi Wolfram, On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 14:54:33 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > I added a section now for the 4.2 release. And (finally!) started > > > cleaning up the wiki a little. > > > > Thanks! As a packager, I must say that this way of handling bugfixes > > isn't great - I only just noticed this now by accident. > > > > What is the issue with making bugfix releases? > > Instead of a minor 4.2.1 we could maybe also simply do a 4.3? Sounds reasonable, saves the need to change the process. Sure it feels strange to make a new release with only 2 commits since the previous release, OTOH we have a regression in one of the tools, which is something rare (thankfully) and problematic enough to justify a rush of schedule. I'll take care of that ASAP if that's OK with you. If you have any other change that should make it into 4.3, now is the time to commit it. -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support