From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D44C433E0 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133822082E for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nvidia.com header.i=@nvidia.com header.b="pXbedjbW" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728122AbgG3Apg (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 20:45:36 -0400 Received: from hqnvemgate25.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.64]:3597 "EHLO hqnvemgate25.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726756AbgG3Apg (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 20:45:36 -0400 Received: from hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqnvemgate25.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, DES-CBC3-SHA) id ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:44:50 -0700 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com ([172.20.161.6]) by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (PGP Universal service); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:45:36 -0700 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com on Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:45:36 -0700 Received: from [10.2.160.194] (10.124.1.5) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:45:35 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 13/14] media: tegra-video: Add CSI MIPI pads calibration To: Dmitry Osipenko , , , , , , , CC: , , , , , , References: <1595883452-17343-1-git-send-email-skomatineni@nvidia.com> <1595883452-17343-14-git-send-email-skomatineni@nvidia.com> <01ee0805-3d57-d857-48e3-5c2245cd4500@nvidia.com> <2ec535c9-55e8-8834-6002-36c75aeb097c@gmail.com> <021707b9-5f72-6f8b-d125-43627ef64a6d@nvidia.com> From: Sowjanya Komatineni Message-ID: <42f25a49-ad2b-4e52-fd99-cb0f52037988@nvidia.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:52:51 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [10.124.1.5] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL111.nvidia.com (172.20.187.18) To HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en-US DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1596069890; bh=MEsrOCbBwTTA5kgp+sH036/e7H0sbwi1c+9X8BbcCJ8=; h=X-PGP-Universal:Subject:To:CC:References:From:Message-ID:Date: User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:X-Originating-IP: X-ClientProxiedBy:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Language; b=pXbedjbWTlW8O1hyYnXM8BNvkiJ+V7YUGdOzeNJvNAc1SJDvPOCixsM5G0966MIzX 8b71jfpKGeo1MVJeb3u9JOJPkW+IvJ7kACkrS+q1AJCbrCLMCmh23EPUlICk1txaXd P4lAUnRQ01ExORMjCYLxiN8usZc6rwxeONaWhyLMKJPYli6XSiVvU8nUCTf3x8Aq3k KWjbIXBUOzJVlxTZQgns/H0GV0GPAQIwZi5i21UN4vuPvk2YLqtFuY9b0QK9JI8TsV 5BfnDolgBNSWveApimGYPRtLMtBcFY2zI6ADoicLPaDzPDzovzb1vlndSQgRCVz2RF wL8ZgtWkhRCKg== Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On 7/29/20 5:43 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > 30.07.2020 03:27, Sowjanya Komatineni =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > ... >>>> Secondly, perhaps a failed calibration isn't a very critical error? >>>> Hence just printing a warning message should be enough. >>> Using dev_err to report calibration failure. Are you suggesting to use >>> dev_warn instead of dev_err? > I meant that failing s_stream might be unnecessary. > > The dev_warn should be more appropriate for a non-critical errors. > >>>> Could you please make a patch that factors all ON/OFF code paths into = a >>>> separate functions? It's a bit difficult to follow the combined code, >>>> especially partial changes in the patches. Thanks in advance! >>> what do you mean by partial changes in patches? >>> >>> Can you please be more clear? >> Also please specify what ON/OFF code paths you are referring to when you >> say to move into separate functions? > I meant to change all the code like this: > > set(on) { > if (on) { > ... > return; > } > > if (!on) > ... > > return; > } > > to somewhat like this: > > set(on) { > if (on) > ret =3D enable(); > else > ret =3D disable(); > > return ret; > } You mean to change tegra_channel_set_stream() ?