From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>,
"jdelvare@suse.com" <jdelvare@suse.com>
Cc: "linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Errant readings on LM81 with T2080 SoC
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2021 20:59:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5709f180-04b5-09b2-e1c4-53eb5c9345d8@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a67ea323-634d-d34e-c63e-b1aaa4737b19@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
On 3/7/21 8:37 PM, Chris Packham wrote:
[ ... ]
>> That's from -ENXIO which is used in only one place in i2c-mpc.c. I'll
>> enable some debug and see what we get.
>
> For the errant readings there was nothing abnormal reported by the driver.
>
> For the "No such device or address" I saw "mpc-i2c ffe119000.i2c: No
> RXAK" which matches up with the -ENXIO return.
>
Id suggest to check the time until not busy and stop in mpc_xfer().
Those hot loops are unusual, and may well mess up the code especially
if preempt is enabled. Also, are you using interrupts or polling in
your system ? The interrupt handler looks a bit odd, with "Read again
to allow register to stabilise".
Do you have fsl,timeout set in the devicetree properties and, if so,
have you played with it ?
Other than that, the only other real idea I have would be to monitor
the i2c bus.
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-08 4:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-07 22:52 Errant readings on LM81 with T2080 SoC Chris Packham
2021-03-08 0:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-08 2:27 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-08 4:37 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-08 4:59 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2021-03-08 20:27 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-08 22:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-10 2:19 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-10 5:06 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-10 21:48 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-11 7:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-11 8:18 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-03-11 15:19 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-11 21:17 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-11 21:34 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-11 23:47 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-12 0:07 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-12 0:19 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-12 9:25 ` David Laight
2021-03-14 21:26 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-15 9:46 ` David Laight
2021-03-18 5:44 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-03-18 3:46 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-18 4:02 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-18 5:39 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-03-08 22:10 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-09 4:36 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-09 5:24 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-09 23:35 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-10 3:29 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5709f180-04b5-09b2-e1c4-53eb5c9345d8@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).