linux-i2c.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Linux I2C <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: eeprom: at24: Document ROHM BR24G01
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 11:33:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMpxmJXcbTnCbseAap=F0QO2Er6ANGSfgPMuoufaD2qQyUbpRA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdW--A2bwe==+A35_sLAS2OkXzi2hY0Ky_dwL0n8irHMZw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Wolfram,
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:33 PM Wolfram Sang
> <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:13:43PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Document the compatible value for the ROHM Semiconductor BR24G01 I2C bus
> > > EEPROM.
> >
> > What is the difference between those two? Could one also be the fallback
> > of the other (just in the highly unlikely case we need "generic" Rohm
> > handling somewhen)?
>
> Good question.  The datasheets look similar.
> Parametric search on rohm.com says the G-series differs in using
> "Cu wire bonding".
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                         Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds

I'm fine with the current form as it's simpler than using two
fallbacks. Do you want to submit another version anyway or can I pick
it up?

Bartosz

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-05 23:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-28 11:13 [PATCH] dt-bindings: eeprom: at24: Document ROHM BR24G01 Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-28 11:33 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-01-28 11:59   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-02-05 10:33     ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2021-02-09 14:16       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-02-09 18:21         ` Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMpxmJXcbTnCbseAap=F0QO2Er6ANGSfgPMuoufaD2qQyUbpRA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).