From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394DEC433ED for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 09:59:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA1D61382 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 09:59:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236185AbhDGJ73 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 05:59:29 -0400 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:51862 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230220AbhDGJ73 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 05:59:29 -0400 Received: from atomide.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64C2880A7; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:00:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 12:59:15 +0300 From: Tony Lindgren To: Vignesh Raghavendra Cc: Dinghao Liu , kjlu@umn.edu, Aaro Koskinen , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: omap: Fix rumtime PM imbalance on error Message-ID: References: <20210407033030.13419-1-dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn> <30ed0224-fba3-75c6-c4aa-e2d0724c291b@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <30ed0224-fba3-75c6-c4aa-e2d0724c291b@ti.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org * Vignesh Raghavendra [210407 07:46]: > Hi, > > On 4/7/21 11:57 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Vignesh Raghavendra [210407 06:20]: > >> Do we need a Fixes: tag to enable stable backports? > > > > Well pm_runtime_resume_and_get() was introduced quite recently, and > > we already handle the error and bail out. And likely after an error > > not much works anyways :) So it might be better to add just a stable > > tag v5.10 and later as further backports are not likely needed. > > > > Agree this is not a critical patch for backport. But I do know that > pm_runtime_resume_and_get() is backported to v5.4 stable kernel at least > [1]. So stable tag with v5.4 perhaps would probably help tools looking > for patches to backport. OK no objections to adding a fixes tag. Regards, Tony > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/12/28/588