> From: Vitor Soares > Date: Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:12:34 > > > Hi Lorenzo, > > > > From: Lorenzo Bianconi > > Date: Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 20:44:05 > > > > > > For today the st_lsm6dsx driver support LSM6DSO and LSM6DSR sensor only in > > > > spi and i2c mode. > > > > > > > > The LSM6DSO and LSM6DSR are also i3c capable so lets give i3c support to > > > > them. > > > > > > Hi Vitor, > > > > > > just few comments inline. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Lorenzo > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vitor Soares > > > > Acked-by: Lorenzo Bianconi > > > > --- > > > > Changes in v3: > > > > Remove unnecessary st_lsm6dsx_i3c_data table used to hold device name > > > > Use st_lsm6dsx_probe new form > > > > > > > > Changes in v2: > > > > Add support for LSM6DSR > > > > Set pm_ops to st_lsm6dsx_pm_ops > > > > > > > > drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/Kconfig | 8 +++- > > > > drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/Makefile | 1 + > > > > drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_i3c.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_i3c.c > > > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > +static int st_lsm6dsx_i3c_probe(struct i3c_device *i3cdev) > > > > +{ > > > > + const struct i3c_device_id *id = i3c_device_match_id(i3cdev, > > > > + st_lsm6dsx_i3c_ids); > > > > > > i3c_device_match_id can theoretically fail so is it better to check > > > return value here? (maybe I am too paranoid :)) > > I was preparing the patch and if the i3c_device_match_id() fail it return > NULL so the st_lsm6dsx_probe() will fail automatically. > Checking the spi_get_device_id(), the drivers don't test the return value > too. multiple drivers deference it directly so I am fine to skip this check. Regards, Lorenzo > > Do you think it is really necessary to test it before the > st_lsm6dsx_probe() function? > > Best regards, > Vitor Soares