> -----Original Message----- > From: Miquel Raynal > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2021 15:52 > To: Clark Wang > Cc: conor.culhane@silvaco.com; alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com; > vitor.soares@synopsys.com; boris.brezillon@bootlin.com; linux- > i3c@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] i3c: master: svc: some bug fixes > > Hi Clark, > > Clark Wang wrote on Thu, 15 Jul 2021 16:24:09 > +0800: > > > Hi, > > > > I am using SVC I3C module recently. I fix some problems and also have a > > question. > > > > My question is: > > Can I3C bus support pure I2C mode in kernel? > > Or in other words, in mixed mode, must there be at least one I3C device on > > the I3C bus? > > > > The pure I3C mode works fine. But when only have one I2C device on the > > I3C bus, the probe in function i3c_master_bus_init() will go error. Because > > there is no one on I3C bus can ACK the I3C message with I3C message > speed. Then > > it will return error at function i3c_master_rstdaa_locked() because of no > ACK > > for 0x7e start byte. > > When I use the following dtb configuration, the above problem occurs. > > &i3c2 { > > #address-cells = <3>; > > #size-cells = <0>; > > pinctrl-names = "default"; > > pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_i3c2>; > > i2c-scl-hz = <400000>; > > status = "okay"; > > > > lsm6dso_i2c: imu@6a { > > compatible = "st,lsm6dso"; > > reg = <0x6a 0x0 0x50>; > > }; > > }; > > > > But I saw a similar configuration example in > > > /home/nxf47749/work/kernel/i3c/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i3c/ > snps,dw-i3c-master.txt. > > I wonder if that can work normally? > > > > I know the definition in the specification is: > > Mixed xxx Bus: I3C Bus topology with both I2C and I3C Devices present > > on the I3C Bus... > > But I think it is feasible to use pure I2C mode with I3C module. > > I am not sure why the use of pure I2C mode is restricted in the software. > > > > If there are errors in my ideas, please correct me in time. Thank you all. > > As you pointed out, I am not aware of a specific I2C only bus setting > but if you find a way to workaround the issue raised above by software > in a rather clean way, then... why not? Hi Miquel, Ok. At present, I just commented part of the code for registering i3c for pure I2C mode testing. I will try to make a clean revision afterwards. Thank you very much for your suggestion! Best Regards, Clark Wang > > > Here are the fixes. > > > > Clark Wang (4): > > i3c: master: svc: move module reset behind clk enable > > i3c: master: svc: fix atomic issue > > i3c: master: svc: add support for slave to stop returning data > > i3c: master: svc: set ODSTOP to let I2C device see the STOP signal > > > > drivers/i3c/master/svc-i3c-master.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++---------- > > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > Thanks, > Miquèl