linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "libaokun (A)" <libaokun1@huawei.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@gmail.com>, <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	<tj@kernel.org>, <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <yebin10@huawei.com>, <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
	Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next V2 1/2] sata_fsl: fix UAF in sata_fsl_port_stop when rmmod sata_fsl
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 10:50:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <05f514bd-b94e-1b34-c6de-4a1126455063@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <08bd2ce6-cee7-d77b-8594-9ff83a471a9b@opensource.wdc.com>

在 2021/11/22 10:33, Damien Le Moal 写道:
> On 2021/11/22 11:03, libaokun (A) wrote:
>> 在 2021/11/20 20:01, Sergei Shtylyov 写道:
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> On 20.11.2021 6:34, Baokun Li wrote:
>>>
>>>> When the `rmmod sata_fsl.ko` command is executed in the PPC64 GNU/Linux,
>>>> a bug is reported:
>>>>    ==================================================================
>>>>    BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on read at 0x80000800805b502c
>>>>    Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
>>>>    NIP [c0000000000388a4] .ioread32+0x4/0x20
>>>>    LR [80000000000c6034] .sata_fsl_port_stop+0x44/0xe0 [sata_fsl]
>>>>    Call Trace:
>>>>     .free_irq+0x1c/0x4e0 (unreliable)
>>>>     .ata_host_stop+0x74/0xd0 [libata]
>>>>     .release_nodes+0x330/0x3f0
>>>>     .device_release_driver_internal+0x178/0x2c0
>>>>     .driver_detach+0x64/0xd0
>>>>     .bus_remove_driver+0x70/0xf0
>>>>     .driver_unregister+0x38/0x80
>>>>     .platform_driver_unregister+0x14/0x30
>>>>     .fsl_sata_driver_exit+0x18/0xa20 [sata_fsl]
>>>>     .__se_sys_delete_module+0x1ec/0x2d0
>>>>     .system_call_exception+0xfc/0x1f0
>>>>     system_call_common+0xf8/0x200
>>>>    ==================================================================
>>>>
>>>> The triggering of the BUG is shown in the following stack:
>>>>
>>>> driver_detach
>>>>     device_release_driver_internal
>>>>       __device_release_driver
>>>>         drv->remove(dev) --> platform_drv_remove/platform_remove
>>>>           drv->remove(dev) --> sata_fsl_remove
>>>>             iounmap(host_priv->hcr_base);            <---- unmap
>>>>             kfree(host_priv);                             <---- free
>>>>         devres_release_all
>>>>           release_nodes
>>>>             dr->node.release(dev, dr->data) --> ata_host_stop
>>>>               ap->ops->port_stop(ap) --> sata_fsl_port_stop
>>>>                   ioread32(hcr_base + HCONTROL)           <---- UAF
>>>>               host->ops->host_stop(host)
>>>>
>>>> The iounmap(host_priv->hcr_base) and kfree(host_priv) commands should
>>>    s/commands/functions/?
>> OK! I'm going to modify this in V3.
>>
>>
>>>> not be executed in drv->remove. These commands should be executed in
>>>> host_stop after port_stop. Therefore, we move these commands to the
>>>> new function sata_fsl_host_stop and bind the new function to host_stop
>>>> by referring to achi.
>>>    You mean AHCI? I don't see where you reference ahci (or achi)...
>> Yes, it's AHCI, I'm sorry for a spelling error here..
>>
>> ahci_platform_ops in drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
>>
>>
>>>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
>>>    Doesn't this need to go into the stable trees?
>>
>> I felt it was needed because the bug was triggered in a very simple way,
>>
>> although PPC linux is rare these days.
>>
>> And I will add
>>
>> Fixes: faf0b2e5afe7 ("drivers/ata: add support to Freescale 3.0Gbps SATA Controller").
> Also add:
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>
>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
>>>>    1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c b/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
>>>> index e5838b23c9e0..30759fd1c3a2 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
>>>> @@ -1430,12 +1430,25 @@ static struct ata_port_operations sata_fsl_ops = {
>>>>        .pmp_detach = sata_fsl_pmp_detach,
>>>>    };
>>>>    +static void sata_fsl_host_stop(struct ata_host *host)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    struct sata_fsl_host_priv *host_priv = host->private_data;
>>>> +
>>>> +    iounmap(host_priv->hcr_base);
>>>> +    kfree(host_priv);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static struct ata_port_operations sata_fsl_platform_ops = {
>>>> +    .inherits       = &sata_fsl_ops,
>>>> +    .host_stop      = sata_fsl_host_stop,
>>>    Why not just add it to the initializer for sata_fsl_ops?
>>
>> This is the AHCI of the reference.
>>
>> Most ATA drivers add host_stop to to the  initializer for  xxx_platform_ops,
>>
>> such as ahci_platform_ops, ahci_brcm_platform_ops, and ahci_imx_ops.
>>
>> It feels like this separates the port operation from the host operation,
>>
>> making the hierarchy of the code clearer.
>>
>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> MBR, Sergei
>>> .
>>
>> Thank you very much for your advice.
>>
>> If there's nothing else to modify, I'll send a patch V3.
>>
>> -- 
>> With Best Regards,
>> Baokun Li
>> .
>>
>

Thank you very much for your advice.

I'm about to send a patch V3 with the changes suggested by you.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Baokun Li
.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-22  2:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-20  3:34 [PATCH -next V2 0/2] fix two bugs when trying rmmod sata_fsl Baokun Li
2021-11-20  3:34 ` [PATCH -next V2 1/2] sata_fsl: fix UAF in sata_fsl_port_stop when " Baokun Li
2021-11-20 12:01   ` Sergei Shtylyov
     [not found]     ` <4d2712d3-00a1-6220-0a86-8580b2f89d03@huawei.com>
2021-11-22  2:33       ` Damien Le Moal
2021-11-22  2:50         ` libaokun (A) [this message]
2021-11-22 18:58       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2021-11-23  1:11         ` libaokun (A)
2021-11-20  3:34 ` [PATCH -next V2 2/2] sata_fsl: fix warning in remove_proc_entry " Baokun Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=05f514bd-b94e-1b34-c6de-4a1126455063@huawei.com \
    --to=libaokun1@huawei.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=hulkci@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sergei.shtylyov@gmail.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=yebin10@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).