From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] block: Add concurrent positioning ranges support
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 09:23:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRI3kMc39XPRLe/u@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210726013806.84815-2-damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 10:38:03AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> The Concurrent Positioning Ranges VPD page (for SCSI) and Log (for ATA)
> contain parameters describing the number of sets of contiguous LBAs that
> can be served independently by a single LUN multi-actuator disk. This
> patch provides the blk_queue_set_cranges() function allowing a device
> driver to signal to the block layer that a disk has multiple actuators,
> each one serving a contiguous range of sectors. To describe the set
> of sector ranges representing the different actuators of a device, the
> data type struct blk_cranges is introduced.
>
> For a device with multiple actuators, a struct blk_cranges is attached
> to the device request queue by the blk_queue_set_cranges() function. The
> function blk_alloc_cranges() is provided for drivers to allocate this
> structure.
>
> The blk_cranges structure contains kobjects (struct kobject) to register
> with sysfs the set of sector ranges defined by a device. On initial
> device scan, this registration is done from blk_register_queue() using
> the block layer internal function blk_register_cranges(). If a driver
> calls blk_queue_set_cranges() for a registered queue, e.g. when a device
> is revalidated, blk_queue_set_cranges() will execute
> blk_register_cranges() to update the queue sysfs attribute files.
>
> The sysfs file structure created starts from the cranges sub-directory
> and contains the start sector and number of sectors served by an
> actuator, with the information for each actuator grouped in one
> directory per actuator. E.g. for a dual actuator drive, we have:
>
> $ tree /sys/block/sdk/queue/cranges/
> /sys/block/sdk/queue/cranges/
> |-- 0
> | |-- nr_sectors
> | `-- sector
> `-- 1
> |-- nr_sectors
> `-- sector
>
> For a regular single actuator device, the cranges directory does not
> exist.
>
> Device revalidation may lead to changes to this structure and to the
> attribute values. When manipulated, the queue sysfs_lock and
> sysfs_dir_lock are held for atomicity, similarly to how the blk-mq and
> elevator sysfs queue sub-directories are protected.
>
> The code related to the management of cranges is added in the new
> file block/blk-cranges.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
> ---
> block/Makefile | 2 +-
> block/blk-cranges.c | 295 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> block/blk-sysfs.c | 13 ++
> block/blk.h | 3 +
> include/linux/blkdev.h | 29 ++++
> 5 files changed, 341 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 block/blk-cranges.c
>
> diff --git a/block/Makefile b/block/Makefile
> index bfbe4e13ca1e..e477e6ca9ea6 100644
> --- a/block/Makefile
> +++ b/block/Makefile
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BLOCK) := bio.o elevator.o blk-core.o blk-sysfs.o \
> blk-lib.o blk-mq.o blk-mq-tag.o blk-stat.o \
> blk-mq-sysfs.o blk-mq-cpumap.o blk-mq-sched.o ioctl.o \
> genhd.o ioprio.o badblocks.o partitions/ blk-rq-qos.o \
> - disk-events.o
> + disk-events.o blk-cranges.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_BOUNCE) += bounce.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_SCSI_REQUEST) += scsi_ioctl.o
> diff --git a/block/blk-cranges.c b/block/blk-cranges.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..deaa09e564f7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/block/blk-cranges.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,295 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Block device concurrent positioning ranges.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2021 Western Digital Corporation or its Affiliates.
> + */
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/blkdev.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +
> +#include "blk.h"
> +
> +static ssize_t blk_crange_sector_show(struct blk_crange *cr, char *page)
> +{
> + return sprintf(page, "%llu\n", cr->sector);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t blk_crange_nr_sectors_show(struct blk_crange *cr, char *page)
> +{
> + return sprintf(page, "%llu\n", cr->nr_sectors);
> +}
> +
> +struct blk_crange_sysfs_entry {
> + struct attribute attr;
> + ssize_t (*show)(struct blk_crange *cr, char *page);
> +};
> +
> +static struct blk_crange_sysfs_entry blk_crange_sector_entry = {
> + .attr = { .name = "sector", .mode = 0444 },
> + .show = blk_crange_sector_show,
> +};
> +
> +static struct blk_crange_sysfs_entry blk_crange_nr_sectors_entry = {
> + .attr = { .name = "nr_sectors", .mode = 0444 },
> + .show = blk_crange_nr_sectors_show,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute *blk_crange_attrs[] = {
> + &blk_crange_sector_entry.attr,
> + &blk_crange_nr_sectors_entry.attr,
> + NULL,
> +};
> +ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(blk_crange);
> +
> +static ssize_t blk_crange_sysfs_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct attribute *attr, char *page)
> +{
> + struct blk_crange_sysfs_entry *entry;
> + struct blk_crange *cr;
> + struct request_queue *q;
> + ssize_t ret;
> +
> + entry = container_of(attr, struct blk_crange_sysfs_entry, attr);
> + cr = container_of(kobj, struct blk_crange, kobj);
> + q = cr->queue;
Nit: I'd find this a little eaier to read if the variables were
initialized at declaration time:
struct blk_crange_sysfs_entry *entry =
container_of(attr, struct blk_crange_sysfs_entry, attr);
struct blk_crange *cr = container_of(kobj, struct blk_crange, kobj);
struct request_queue *q = cr->queue;
(or maybe even don't bother with the q local variable).
> +/*
> + * Dummy release function to make kobj happy.
> + */
> +static void blk_cranges_sysfs_nop_release(struct kobject *kobj)
> +{
> +}
How do we ensure the kobj is still alive while it is accessed?
> +void blk_queue_set_cranges(struct gendisk *disk, struct blk_cranges *cr)
s/blk_queue/disk/
> mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_lock);
> +
> + ret = blk_register_cranges(disk, NULL);
> + if (ret) {
> + mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_dir_lock);
> + kobject_del(&q->kobj);
> + blk_trace_remove_sysfs(dev);
> + kobject_put(&dev->kobj);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> if (q->elevator) {
> ret = elv_register_queue(q, false);
> if (ret) {
> + blk_unregister_cranges(disk);
> mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
> mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_dir_lock);
> kobject_del(&q->kobj);
Please use a goto instead of duplicating the code.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-10 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-26 1:38 [PATCH v3 0/4] Initial support for multi-actuator HDDs Damien Le Moal
2021-07-26 1:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] block: Add concurrent positioning ranges support Damien Le Moal
2021-07-26 7:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-26 8:30 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-07-26 8:47 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-26 11:33 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-07-27 14:07 ` Paolo Valente
2021-07-27 23:44 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-10 8:23 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-08-10 11:03 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-10 16:02 ` hch
2021-08-10 23:46 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-07-26 1:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] scsi: sd: add " Damien Le Moal
2021-08-10 8:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-26 1:38 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] libata: support concurrent positioning ranges log Damien Le Moal
2021-07-26 7:34 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-08-10 8:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-26 1:38 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] doc: document sysfs queue/cranges attributes Damien Le Moal
2021-07-26 7:35 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-08-10 8:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-10 11:04 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-07-28 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Initial support for multi-actuator HDDs Damien Le Moal
2021-08-06 2:12 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-06 3:41 ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-08-06 4:05 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-06 8:35 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-08-06 8:52 ` Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YRI3kMc39XPRLe/u@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).