From: "Reimar Döffinger" <Reimar.Doeffinger@gmx.de> To: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com> Cc: "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, Jens Axboe <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: Disable ATA_CMD_READ_LOG_DMA_EXT in problematic cases. Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 20:01:21 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YRv5cafgitLlfiCs@reimardoeffinger.de> (raw) In-Reply-To: <DM6PR04MB708170BD5DC19ABC03FDC4A3E7FE9@DM6PR04MB7081.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 07:45:58AM +0000, Damien Le Moal wrote: > On 2021/08/17 2:26, Reimar Döffinger wrote: > > The patch is a best-guess + "in doubt disable" attempt at > > auto-detecting. > > As I mentioned the data is rather light, so I wanted to only add the > > option at first. > > Now it does 2 things in addition: > > - disable it for Crucial MX500 because the issue was seen and confirmed > > with and without PATA converter with that device > > - disable it for anything connected with a PATA converter because there > > are lots of bug reports with different devices that have a PATA > > converter in common. Unfortunately no confirmation from any of those. > > However in quick testing I could verify the MX500 issue only with > > PATA adapter myself, so it seems like an appropriate precaution, > > especially as now with the new code it is possible to override both > > ways. > > How can you detect the presence of a PATA converter ? Is it what "ap_flags & > ATA_FLAG_SATA" indicates ? Well, if my understanding is right when ATA_FLAG_SATA is not set then it means it is a PATA controller. So if someone has a PATA device that supports READ_LOG_DMA then it would be disabled even in that case, but I had the impression that command is new enough for this to be not very likely (and I am guessing most PATA users care more about things working than getting the best possible performance). > > Aside: I don't have the ATA spec, so I can't check, but I do find it > > a bit suspicious that the logs look like the code runs the > > READ_LOG_DMA command before SETXFERMODE is done, and thus while the > > device is still in PIO mode? This is a bit off-topic for the patch, so you can leave me to try and figure it out myself, but I am afraid your explanation does not quite add up to me: > ata_read_log_page() has a retry loop: it first tries ATA_CMD_READ_LOG_DMA_EXT > and if that fails, it goes with PIO ATA_CMD_READ_LOG_EXT. So there is no problem > for non-buggy drives with this. Note that initially, dev->dma_mode may not be > set, so PIO is done directly. Hm, I see that might have been the intent, but that does not seem to be the case. The condition is: > if (dev->dma_mode && However the correct way to check is to use ata_dma_enabled. Which is: return (adev->dma_mode == 0xFF ? 0 : 1); So kind of the opposite (actually I think dev->dma_mode is always true), and matching that ata_bus_probe sets dev->dma_mode = 0xff; Now ata_do_set_mode would set up the proper value, but the little problem is that that one is never called for SATA (and quite a few PATA?) controllers. So it seems there is no working way to detect if dma is enabled or not? Unless the initialization value after reset would need to depend on the controller, setting it to 0xff for no dma for PATA and some "random" UDMA setting (or a newly added DMA_SATA one) for SATA controllers? > Once set, DMA version will be used unless the > horkage bit is set. So this all works as expected, and there will (normally) be > no failed command even when DMA is not yet set. A typical log looks as below, now I admit it is very confusing because it says the mode is 6.0 Gbps which is not even possible with PATA, so not really clear which mode is active at which point. However I think that DMA is only properly up after ata_do_set_mode (however that is not used at all by most controllers it seems?), which is the "failed to set xfermode", however that is long after the "READ LOG DMA EXT failed". [ 1.245078] ata5: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0xc161b000 port 0xc161b300 irq 28 [ 1.557761] ata5: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300) [ 1.557929] ata5.00: FORCE: horkage modified (noncq) [ 1.558096] ata5.00: ACPI cmd ef/10:09:00:00:00:b0 (SET FEATURES) succeeded [ 1.558101] ata5.00: ACPI cmd ef/10:03:00:00:00:b0 (SET FEATURES) filtered out [ 1.558250] ata5.00: ATA-10: Lenovo SPEED UP-CL-240GB, V2.7, max UDMA/133 [ 1.558253] ata5.00: 468862128 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (not used) [ 6.663379] ata5.00: qc timeout (cmd 0x47) [ 6.663390] ata5.00: READ LOG DMA EXT failed, trying PIO [ 6.663394] ata5.00: failed to get Identify Device Data, Emask 0x40 [ 6.663407] ata5.00: failed to set xfermode (err_mask=0x40) [ 6.977799] ata5: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-17 18:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-08-14 13:47 [PATCH] libata: add kernel parameter to force ATA_HORKAGE_NO_DMA_LOG Reimar Döffinger 2021-08-15 8:18 ` Christoph Hellwig 2021-08-15 16:27 ` [PATCH] libata: Disable ATA_CMD_READ_LOG_DMA_EXT in problematic cases Reimar Döffinger 2021-08-16 0:10 ` Damien Le Moal 2021-08-16 17:15 ` Reimar Döffinger 2021-08-17 19:06 ` Reimar Döffinger 2021-08-18 22:49 ` Damien Le Moal 2021-08-16 17:26 ` Reimar Döffinger 2021-08-17 7:45 ` Damien Le Moal 2021-08-17 18:01 ` Reimar Döffinger [this message] 2021-08-17 19:03 ` [PATCH] libata: fix setting and checking of DMA state Reimar Döffinger 2021-08-18 23:30 ` Damien Le Moal 2021-08-19 8:13 ` [PATCH] libata: fix " Reimar Döffinger 2021-08-19 12:56 ` Reimar Döffinger 2021-09-27 8:56 ` Paul Menzel 2021-09-27 9:10 ` Reimar Döffinger 2021-09-27 9:15 ` Damien Le Moal 2021-10-03 13:28 ` [PATCH v4] Fixes to DMA state check Reimar Döffinger 2021-10-03 13:28 ` [PATCH 1/6] libata: fix checking of DMA state Reimar Döffinger 2021-10-03 13:28 ` [PATCH 2/6] libata-scsi: " Reimar Döffinger 2021-10-03 13:28 ` [PATCH 3/6] pata_ali: " Reimar Döffinger 2021-10-03 13:28 ` [PATCH 4/6] pata_amd: " Reimar Döffinger 2021-10-03 13:28 ` [PATCH 5/6] pata_optidma: " Reimar Döffinger 2021-10-03 13:28 ` [PATCH 6/6] pata_radisys: " Reimar Döffinger 2021-10-12 2:20 ` [PATCH v4] Fixes to DMA state check Damien Le Moal 2021-10-12 6:30 ` Reimar Döffinger [not found] ` <605EE991-5DA2-4A8D-9691-967D68D3AB51@gmx.de> 2021-10-12 6:32 ` Damien Le Moal 2021-10-12 6:33 ` Damien Le Moal 2021-08-15 16:34 ` [PATCH] libata: add kernel parameter to force ATA_HORKAGE_NO_DMA_LOG Reimar Döffinger
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=YRv5cafgitLlfiCs@reimardoeffinger.de \ --email@example.com \ --cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH] libata: Disable ATA_CMD_READ_LOG_DMA_EXT in problematic cases.' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).