linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] scsi: sd: add concurrent positioning ranges support
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 18:14:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c24e49dd-2605-aa9d-a6d7-47e519788d51@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210721104205.885115-3-damien.lemoal@wdc.com>

On 7/21/21 12:42 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> Add the sd_read_cpr() function to the sd scsi disk driver to discover
> if a device has multiple concurrent positioning ranges (i.e. multiple
> actuators on an HDD). This new function is called from
> sd_revalidate_disk() and uses the block layer functions
> blk_alloc_cranges() and blk_queue_set_cranges() to set a device
> cranges according to the information retrieved from log page B9h,
> if the device supports it.
> 
> The format of the Concurrent Positioning Ranges VPD page B9h is defined
> in section 6.6.6 of SBC-5.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
> ---
>   drivers/scsi/sd.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/scsi/sd.h |  1 +
>   2 files changed, 81 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index b8d55af763f9..b1e767a01b9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -3125,6 +3125,85 @@ static void sd_read_security(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned char *buffer)
>   		sdkp->security = 1;
>   }
>   
> +static inline sector_t sd64_to_sectors(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, u8 *buf)
> +{
> +	return logical_to_sectors(sdkp->device, get_unaligned_be64(buf));
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * sd_read_cpr - Query concurrent positioning ranges
> + * @sdkp:	disk to query
> + */
> +static void sd_read_cpr(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
> +{
> +	unsigned char *buffer, *desc;
> +	struct blk_cranges *cr = NULL;
> +	unsigned int nr_cpr = 0;
> +	int i, vpd_len, buf_len = SD_BUF_SIZE;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We need to have the capacity set first for the block layer to be
> +	 * able to check the ranges.
> +	 */
> +	if (sdkp->first_scan)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (!sdkp->capacity)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Concurrent Positioning Ranges VPD: there can be at most 256 ranges,
> +	 * leading to a maximum page size of 64 + 256*32 bytes.
> +	 */
> +	buf_len = 64 + 256*32;
> +	buffer = kmalloc(buf_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!buffer || scsi_get_vpd_page(sdkp->device, 0xb9, buffer, buf_len))
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	/* We must have at least a 64B header and one 32B range descriptor */
> +	vpd_len = get_unaligned_be16(&buffer[2]) + 3;
> +	if (vpd_len > buf_len || vpd_len < 64 + 32 || (vpd_len & 31)) {
> +		sd_printk(KERN_ERR, sdkp,
> +			  "Invalid Concurrent Positioning Ranges VPD page\n");
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	nr_cpr = (vpd_len - 64) / 32;
> +	if (nr_cpr == 1) {
> +		nr_cpr = 0;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	cr = blk_alloc_cranges(sdkp->disk, nr_cpr);
> +	if (!cr) {
> +		nr_cpr = 0;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	desc = &buffer[64];
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_cpr; i++, desc += 32) {
> +		if (desc[0] != i) {
> +			sd_printk(KERN_ERR, sdkp,
> +				"Invalid Concurrent Positioning Range number\n");
> +			nr_cpr = 0;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		cr->ranges[i].sector = sd64_to_sectors(sdkp, desc + 8);
> +		cr->ranges[i].nr_sectors = sd64_to_sectors(sdkp, desc + 16);
> +	}
> +
> +out:
> +	blk_queue_set_cranges(sdkp->disk, cr);

See? We are _are_ creating a new set of ranges.
So why bother updating the old ones?

> +	if (nr_cpr && sdkp->nr_actuators != nr_cpr) {
> +		sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp,
> +			  "%u concurrent positioning ranges\n", nr_cpr);
> +		sdkp->nr_actuators = nr_cpr;
> +	}
> +
> +	kfree(buffer);
> +}
> +
>   /*
>    * Determine the device's preferred I/O size for reads and writes
>    * unless the reported value is unreasonably small, large, not a
> @@ -3240,6 +3319,7 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
>   		sd_read_app_tag_own(sdkp, buffer);
>   		sd_read_write_same(sdkp, buffer);
>   		sd_read_security(sdkp, buffer);
> +		sd_read_cpr(sdkp);
>   	}
>   
>   	/*
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.h b/drivers/scsi/sd.h
> index b59136c4125b..2e5932bde43d 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.h
> @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ struct scsi_disk {
>   	u8		protection_type;/* Data Integrity Field */
>   	u8		provisioning_mode;
>   	u8		zeroing_mode;
> +	u8		nr_actuators;		/* Number of actuators */
>   	unsigned	ATO : 1;	/* state of disk ATO bit */
>   	unsigned	cache_override : 1; /* temp override of WCE,RCD */
>   	unsigned	WCE : 1;	/* state of disk WCE bit */
> 
Otherwise:

Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de                              +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-22 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-21 10:42 [PATCH 0/4] Initial support for multi-actuator HDDs Damien Le Moal
2021-07-21 10:42 ` [PATCH 1/4] block: Add concurrent positioning ranges support Damien Le Moal
2021-07-22 16:11   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-22 23:20     ` Damien Le Moal
2021-07-22 23:59     ` Damien Le Moal
2021-07-21 10:42 ` [PATCH 2/4] scsi: sd: add " Damien Le Moal
2021-07-21 18:01   ` Dan Carpenter
2021-07-22 16:14   ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2021-07-22 23:26     ` Damien Le Moal
2021-07-21 10:42 ` [PATCH 3/4] libata: support concurrent positioning ranges log Damien Le Moal
2021-07-22 17:34   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-22 23:27     ` Damien Le Moal
2021-07-21 10:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] doc: document sysfs queue/cranges attributes Damien Le Moal
2021-07-22 15:58 ` [PATCH 0/4] Initial support for multi-actuator HDDs Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c24e49dd-2605-aa9d-a6d7-47e519788d51@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).