From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5827BC43387 for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 17:52:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21AA72086C for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 17:52:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1547315527; bh=TnMhz+UqgUAfFY6OLg+QUEnCJtRgLzYWTLzSaOiksRM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=hbsQuvHu0V5pzC9rmzvB7FBbmbwpq2iR1RE8eE7E372CEfwqS6/L1O9tUNfgld3jI THFtsvSD11ycQ1oAgu/72z6Tta87dpjPgr5KfrT8zh/utz+L1jA5c1hvDBEaW5ea+C AZntk4W2zcRn9H3JJPummS4CvEx1bpnIqjO9n83s= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725845AbfALRwG (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2019 12:52:06 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48322 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725843AbfALRwG (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2019 12:52:06 -0500 Received: from archlinux (cpc91196-cmbg18-2-0-cust659.5-4.cable.virginm.net [81.96.234.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 05F352084C; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 17:52:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1547315525; bh=TnMhz+UqgUAfFY6OLg+QUEnCJtRgLzYWTLzSaOiksRM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=j7CBm2maHqmDQP6zImqWDL0wQ0wOCcpmA7fNwFSiX58bhAq23sNUQaRCBoXrwTxKw FwIxeNEyRdq7dWAJzoTk1mYkwNi8mnX6A6wYyqFMoHnum3Uovg4cMlYCDERvzMXmf/ acQEJbEctDhbde95xgQ2jlBir8kdoOfHixn80heA= Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 17:51:59 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Fabrice Gasnier Cc: Benjamin Gaignard , William Breathitt Gray , Patrick Havelange , Greg Kroah-Hartman , , Lars-Peter Clausen , Benjamin GAIGNARD , , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Hartmut Knaack , Andrew Morton , Linux ARM Subject: Re: New IIO/counter driver Message-ID: <20190112175159.3dac7a70@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <8b2bb569-a6e0-25ec-740d-48083b30fe60@st.com> References: <20190108004632.GA3247@icarus> <8b2bb569-a6e0-25ec-740d-48083b30fe60@st.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 12:01:57 +0100 Fabrice Gasnier wrote: > On 1/8/19 11:57 AM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: > > Le mar. 8 janv. 2019 =C3=A0 01:46, William Breathitt Gray > > a =C3=A9crit : =20 > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:45:37PM +0100, Patrick Havelange wrote: =20 > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I'm in the process of adding a new IIO/counter driver, however I also= saw > >>> that there was a work in progress to have a separate counter subsyste= m ( > >>> https://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-iio&m=3D153974167727206 ). But it seems = there is > >>> no recent progress on it. > >>> What is the state of those patches ? Is it still interesting to devel= op the > >>> driver as an IIO/counter , or should I use already that new subsystem= ? > >>> > >>> Best Regards, > >>> > >>> Patrick Havelange. =20 > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> I am still open to merging this patchset and maintaining the Counter > >> subsystem. However, I took the lack of response for my latest > >> submission to indicate a loss of interest in this patchset's approach. > >> If there are still people who want this, I can rebase and resend this > >> patchset for submission; the past few versions have primarily been code > >> clarity and documentation changes so I believe the core design itself = is > >> somewhat stable now. > >> > >> Just let me know how best to proceed and I shall be happy to oblige -- > >> whether to continue maintaining this patchset or to drop this design in > >> favor of improving the existing IIO Counter code in the kernel. > >> > >> I'll CC those from the patchset submission to keep them in the loop. = =20 > >=20 > > I confirm that I still interested to get those patches merged. > >=20 > > Regards, > > Benjamin =20 > Hi, >=20 > Same for me, In a more abstract fashion (I don't have any hardware of this type!) I'm still keen for the counter subsystem to go in. Hopefully, if Greg or anyone else wants to take a detailed look they will have time this cycle to do so. I was pretty happy with the last version I read through. There will always be things to improved, but as long a we are happy with the userspace inteface, the little things can happen later. Jonathan >=20 > Regards, > Fabrice > >> > >> Sincerely, > >> > >> William Breathitt Gray > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> linux-arm-kernel mailing list > >> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel =20 > >=20 > >=20 > > =20