From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD8E8C433FF for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:26:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03582064A for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:26:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1564604786; bh=HiSDpvUG1X9DzOota6oWFEr3hP3pdZfxExJeEHf3noc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=LEWtbTbl6mnCpX8sJTxSzQKCJrLurzwD9bicrf6EjZ0HqdtQt52qNU8eQWOg9PweE wtmDhER6TnHyXf+/zf9ggGj4bkIsRQ5lPx3XmUDp8OTCbN5VSUYWvtQqKV3qCPaiT3 /KH+xpgkRj8YTKTUNC4VFqIeubjsCOnttkE1OIsI= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730419AbfGaU00 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:26:26 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:58118 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728232AbfGaU00 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:26:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+a5BC2SMQTZyNnosj2+NVoaE/cuHtdCJLsTbfMI7CM8=; b=cd0EZcQkx68qz1mV7MZC2uM8w P5cYOfzRqT4jAj1XeIa5cZwCKRpuEARrsXGCDxCq8sgpCmoEJ8VyMoB1ZGWIv3KkGkC8AIFMmG3zu rlsmWUq3FLoiDUPohjPULvC4w5BLIzEmbwgXzpFT+L80k80QNHwktIQFstvBvlBiAagdTYKLP7kd6 mgvL4iD+sHmcbJxX4pbsqTYJFd9WsDq0iZww0LtIbpC3Rwlt6XCZ+VcKY2odTaplLXORSAqBC7jw+ ktYQ73C/T59Q53D5UHvn8GEbIRSj5leo+helE+/aJGkkXgpqWFvenf2ZTIwIz7KLtjIJb7x/x8Xk3 8x9hawtXg==; Received: from [191.33.152.89] (helo=coco.lan) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hsvB0-0001Q8-KC; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:26:22 +0000 Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 17:26:13 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Mark Brown Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Linux Doc Mailing List , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Maxime Ripard , samba-technical@lists.samba.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen , Evgeniy Dushistov , Jonathan Cameron , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Steve French , Alexander Shishkin , Chen-Yu Tsai , Suzuki K Poulose , linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, Dave Kleikamp , Mark Rutland , Evgeniy Polyakov , Mathieu Poirier , Rob Herring , jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Hartmut Knaack , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ReST conversion patches not applied yet Message-ID: <20190731172613.32d65ad8@coco.lan> In-Reply-To: <20190731202007.GI4369@sirena.org.uk> References: <20190731141734.1fa9ce64@lwn.net> <20190731202007.GI4369@sirena.org.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Em Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:20:07 +0100 Mark Brown escreveu: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 02:17:34PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > > As promised, this is the rebased version of the patches that were not applied > > > from the /26 patch series because you had merge conflicts. > > > > > > They're all based on your docs-next branch, so should apply fine. > > > > > > The first one fixes all but one error with a broken reference. > > > > > > The only broken reference right now is due to a DT patch with was not > > > accepted (no idea why), but whose driver is upstream. > > > All but 5/6 applied, thanks. > > Oh, I still hadn't reviewed this version of the SPI stuff :( It is basically the one sent on that /26 patch series, just rebased on the top of docs-next. > There were outstanding questions about where it was going to get moved > to but if I read the diff correctly it looks like it didn't actually get > moved in the end? Yeah, it doesn't have the move. My understanding from our discussions is that we didn't reach a conclusion. In any case, I can send a separate patch with the move part once we reach an agreement about what's the best way to proceed (or you can do it directly, if you prefer so). Thanks, Mauro