From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: "Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@analog.com>
Cc: "linux-spi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
"baolin.wang@linaro.org" <baolin.wang@linaro.org>,
"bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
"linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
"linus.walleij@linaro.org" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"jic23@kernel.org" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"f.fainelli@gmail.com" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"orsonzhai@gmail.com" <orsonzhai@gmail.com>,
"zhang.lyra@gmail.com" <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/15] spi: make `cs_change_delay` the first user of the `spi_delay` logic
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:43:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190916134309.GH4352@sirena.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <458cbb212fbd04c157c9861501f51c03ea958302.camel@analog.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1044 bytes --]
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 01:04:42PM +0000, Ardelean, Alexandru wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-09-16 at 13:47 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > That v3 seems to be a small subset of this series?
> Ack.
> V3 is the first 4 patches from this series.
> Well, patches 3 & 4 are squashed.
> I am 100% convinced that the entire series is a good idea.
> In the sense that a `struct spi_delay` may be a good idea, but at the same time, it may be un-needed.
> All I wanted to do, was to add another delay somewhere, and got lost in the rework of current delays.
> I thought about proposing just the first 4 patches [on their own], but I thought that showing the current series as-is
> now, may be a good idea as well [to gather some feedback].
I think it makes more sense to review as a whole series rather than only
a part of the conversion, it doesn't really help to only do part of it.
Please fix your mail client to word wrap within paragraphs at something
substantially less than 80 columns. Doing this makes your messages much
easier to read and reply to.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-16 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-13 11:45 [RFC PATCH 00/15] Unify SPI delays into an `struct spi_delay` Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 01/15] spi: move `cs_change_delay` backwards compat logic outside switch Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 02/15] spi: introduce spi_delay struct as "value + unit" & spi_delay_exec() Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 03/15] spi: make `cs_change_delay` the first user of the `spi_delay` logic Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-16 12:25 ` Mark Brown
2019-09-16 12:37 ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2019-09-16 12:47 ` Mark Brown
2019-09-16 13:04 ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2019-09-16 13:43 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2019-09-17 6:05 ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 04/15] iio: imu: adis: convert cs_change_delay to spi_delay struct Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 05/15] spi: sprd: convert transfer word delay " Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 06/15] spi: orion: use new `word_delay` field for SPI transfers Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 07/15] spi: spidev: use new `word_delay` field for spi transfers Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 08/15] spi: core,atmel: convert `word_delay_usecs` -> `word_delay` for spi_device Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 09/15] spi: introduce `delay` field for `spi_transfer` + spi_transfer_exec() Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 10/15] spi: use new `spi_transfer_delay` helper where straightforward Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 11/15] spi: tegra114: use `spi_transfer_delay` helper Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 12/15] spi: spi-loopback-test: use new `delay` field Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 13/15] spi: spidev: use new `delay` field for spi transfers Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 14/15] spi: tegra114: change format for `spi_set_cs_timing()` function Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-13 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 15/15] spi: implement SW control for CS times Alexandru Ardelean
2019-09-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH 00/15] Unify SPI delays into an `struct spi_delay` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190916134309.GH4352@sirena.co.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.Ardelean@analog.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linaro.org \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
--cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).