From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39A2C32771 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 18:15:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CEB2465A for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 18:15:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728904AbgAOSPB (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:15:01 -0500 Received: from sender4-op-o18.zoho.com ([136.143.188.18]:17824 "EHLO sender4-op-o18.zoho.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728921AbgAOSPB (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:15:01 -0500 Received: from nessie (pool-173-73-58-202.washdc.fios.verizon.net [173.73.58.202]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 157911205724615.197368123364186; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 10:14:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:58:20 +0000 From: Dan Robertson To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Linus Walleij , Andy Shevchenko , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: accel: bma400: integer underflow setting accel scale Message-ID: <20200115175820.GB29555@nessie> References: <20200115174531.p623ukjibn6kg6zz@kili.mountain> <20200115174324.GA29555@nessie> <20200115180518.GF9562@kadam> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200115180518.GF9562@kadam> X-ZohoMailClient: External Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 09:09:01PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 05:43:24PM +0000, Dan Robertson wrote: > > Thanks for taking a look at the code and your feedback on the driver! > > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 08:45:31PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > We put an upper bound on "val2" but we also need to prevent negative > > > values. > > > > "val" is not used past the invalid value check. We only use "val" to make sure > > that it is in fact 0. AFAIK there is no "upper bound" on "val", it should be > > zero or we return -EINVAL. Am I missing something? > > This patch affects "val2" not "val". ;) Ah! Right, my bad :/ Good catch! Cheers, - Dan