From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C9AC4332B for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 08:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE4C20774 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 08:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kemnade.info header.i=@kemnade.info header.b="A3NZJngu" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726969AbgCTILc (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 04:11:32 -0400 Received: from mail.andi.de1.cc ([85.214.55.253]:51330 "EHLO mail.andi.de1.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726814AbgCTILa (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 04:11:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kemnade.info; s=20180802; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=HmIK2NGFOH4BtXBgdzImt8JfFOfa3vebJbRC3dmAtks=; b=A3NZJngupKcZ0ByfhcyQE/rDVH WU4ufi5tYyA/OzG2rykN8nG9/8eIbg4TBX/tkNcnwmQ8MwroPAAjx3a9rPzBJQHj1qVQZjIAdTN1k Sx6syK14WtaDWlUaZH3Cxx7vCPrsKz9oVak5TzEaZ5+m9Ax/41Ry0nyV9vX0yXqkG9aw=; Received: from p200300ccff093a00e2cec3fffe93fc31.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([2003:cc:ff09:3a00:e2ce:c3ff:fe93:fc31] helo=eeepc) by mail.andi.de1.cc with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jFCkP-00058j-VB; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 09:11:19 +0100 Received: from andi by eeepc with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jFCkI-00039Q-7o; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 09:11:10 +0100 From: Andreas Kemnade To: lee.jones@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, a.zummo@towertech.it, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, stefan@agner.ch, b.galvani@gmail.com, phh@phh.me, letux-kernel@openphoenux.org, knaack.h@gmx.de, lars@metafoo.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, jic23@kernel.org Cc: Andreas Kemnade Subject: [PATCH v7 4/7] mfd: rn5t618: add more subdevices Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 09:11:02 +0100 Message-Id: <20200320081105.12026-5-andreas@kemnade.info> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20200320081105.12026-1-andreas@kemnade.info> References: <20200320081105.12026-1-andreas@kemnade.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Since the RC5T619 has a RTC, use a separate subdevice list for that. The ADC should be the same as in the RN5T618, according to drivers in the wild, but since it is not tested, the ADC is only added for the RC5T619. Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade --- Changes in v6: - squashed with patch from former ADC patchset Changes in v3: - alignment cleanup drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c b/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c index 7686cc36e8c0..bc117adede4c 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -22,6 +23,13 @@ static const struct mfd_cell rn5t618_cells[] = { { .name = "rn5t618-wdt" }, }; +static const struct mfd_cell rc5t619_cells[] = { + { .name = "rn5t618-adc" }, + { .name = "rn5t618-regulator" }, + { .name = "rc5t619-rtc" }, + { .name = "rn5t618-wdt" }, +}; + static bool rn5t618_volatile_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg) { switch (reg) { @@ -167,8 +175,16 @@ static int rn5t618_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c, return ret; } - ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&i2c->dev, -1, rn5t618_cells, - ARRAY_SIZE(rn5t618_cells), NULL, 0, NULL); + if (priv->variant == RC5T619) + ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&i2c->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, + rc5t619_cells, + ARRAY_SIZE(rc5t619_cells), + NULL, 0, NULL); + else + ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&i2c->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, + rn5t618_cells, + ARRAY_SIZE(rn5t618_cells), + NULL, 0, NULL); if (ret) { dev_err(&i2c->dev, "failed to add sub-devices: %d\n", ret); return ret; -- 2.20.1